AP HC Restrains Venkata Rao From Issuing Notice as Part of SIT in TTD Laddu Row
Vijayawada: Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court of Tirupati published an order that prevented Venkata Rao from the allegations of the supply of Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala Tirumala
Justice N. A single judge bank headed by N. Harinath on Thursday, YSRC Senior leader YV Subba Raid’s petition filed by AP Bhavan’s former special officer Filed by the former private officer K. Chinnpana, Bharatia Nagarik Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita’nın objected to him in accordance with the episode.
Supreme Court Senior Advisor C. Nageswara Rao, Attorney V. Uday Kumar and petition K. Chinnpana appeared in the name of the defendant J. Venkata Rao’nun a special investigation team directed from the Supreme Court, he said.
According to SC orders, two civil servants from the CBI will nominate by the director, the AP police will be nominated by the two Officer AP government and a senior civil servant from the FSSAI.
Senior lawyer, the defendant Rao’nun initially conducted an investigation on the issue and the Apex Court gave orders to create a SIT, after the AP’s replace SIT and responding RAO’nun said that the answer. However, the defendant RAO publishes notifications in the petition that asks for a witness to the investigation before the SIT office in Tirupati.
Senior lawyer, RAO’nun officially called as a member of SIT, although not officially called, he noted how.
In the meantime, the standing lawyer PSP Suresh Kumar, who appeared for the CBI joint director, said that SIT was not a party to the trials and that the CBI director accepted the investigation of the defendant RAO and directed the investigation to continue the investigation in a professional way.
After listening to both sides, the court asked the defendant Rao was not called the Officer representing the EP in SIT, the CBI joint director could not direct the investigation to conduct the investigation and could not publish the issue for the next hearing on 3 July.
Meanwhile, law experts asked for the status of an investigation carried out in such a scenario between 28 October 2024 – 19 June 2025, and said that the CBI should approach the Apex court to explain what was happening in SIT.
