Why won’t Australian say Israel is committing genocide in Gaza?

You should wonder how much of Israel’s actions in Gaza should be in many Western countries (although not all) in many Western countries, as well as Anthony Albanian and Penny Wong, as genocide.

Assessment International Genocide Scholars Association (IAGs) “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza, the prevention and punishment of the United Nations genocide offense (1948)” (policies in Gaza and what the penalty convention is in Gaza II.

Individual Genocide Academicians And leading law centers He’s been using the explanation for months Great Human Rights Groups– Israeli Human Rights Groups– Israel And Jewish academics– leading Israelis And Israeli media.

Reading the IAGS decision, which summarizes the case of Netanyahu regime in Gaza as a genocide, clearly demonstrates why so many people have reached the same result:

• “Remote and deliberate attacks on civilians and civil infrastructure”;
• “Torture, arbitrary detention and sexual and reproductive violence; deliberate attacks on medical experts, humanitarian workers and journalists, and the deliberate deprived of food, water, medicine and electricity required for the survival of the population”;
• forced displacement of the whole population;
• Destruction of all families and all generations; Killing or injury of 50,000 children; Israeli leaders who describe the Palestinians in Gaza as enemies and ‘human animals’ as a whole and expresses the intention of’ maximum damage ‘,’ straightening Gaza ‘and converting Gaza into hell’;
• Netanyahu’s plan to force Trump to force the entire Palestinian population (Still US policy) And
• “The deliberate destruction of agricultural areas, food stores and furnaces and other violence that prevents food production shows that the Palestinians are deliberately affected by the rejection and restriction of humanitarian aid.”

In the face of such an immoral catalog, the question is increasingly resistant to defining the Australian government’s actions in Gaza. Australia is one of the states that signed the 1948 UN Genocide Convention and therefore acknowledges that the genocide is a crime within the scope of international law they commit to prevention and punishment ”.

Foreign Minister made a statement in April 2024 Marking 30 years after Rwandan genocide“Unexpected atrocities and an inhuman period”. “Australia, Rwanda committed in Rwanda against serious international crimes committed to accountability does not change,” Wong, “he said.

Calling a genocide, which has been safely for decades in the past, which has been committed in a country at that time, is of course very different from most Westerners and a significant ally of the United States of the United States-and the key impressive. Especially when the United States itself, the security guarantee of that country and Australia, has a history of success in the Australian politics and the media.

In order to prevent Albanian and Wong further, to define Netanyahu’s actions as genocide, it seems that countries such as France, England, Canada and Germany are not willing. Although some Western countries such as Ireland and Spain are afraid of demanding the stop of the genocide of Netanyahu, the main allies of Australia were either postponed to the South African case waiting against Israel at the International Court of Justice or rejected this term. The history of the Albanian government’s reactions to Israeli atrocities shows that both strong internal pressure and a kind of international cover.

The debate about the recognition of a Palestinian state served as a distraction and described the Albanian government more progressively than actually. The recognition of Palestine is a global position; The only person who does not share this is the right -wing supporters in countries such as Netanyahu regime, Trump regime and Australia. But it is also a safe position that does not require any action. The recognition of the ongoing genocide in Gaza requires a moral duty to prevent this, not only the necessity of “prevention and punishment”, not only the necessity of “prevention and punishment” under the UN Convention, even if it is limited to the sanctions of Australia and the reduction of diplomatic ties.

Israel’s primary sponsor in the genocide, the United States, the government wants to avoid acting against the Netanyahu regime, not just racist of its ministers. It should not recognize genocide to avoid this. And to do this, you should look at the facts of the persecution and deny, deny, deny.