google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Gregg Wallace BANNED from working at the BBC in scathing dismissal letter as sacked presenter is blasted for using autism diagnosis as an excuse for ‘inappropriate behaviour’

Gregg Wallace, managers ‘decided that they do not trust that you can change learned behaviors’ was banned from working at BBC.

In a letter of dismissal, the company clearly stated that he would not work as a BBC server after an investigation into the 60 -year -old Wallace’s behavior of Masterchef.

When the decision came to the decision, the BBC said that Wallace took into account the diagnosis of autism, but despite the education in 2019, they concluded that they struggled to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate behavior in the workplace ‘.

After the first allegations, Lewis Silkins, who was appointed by MasterChef producers Banijay in November, was not yet published, but Wallace insisted that it was cleared of the most serious grroping claims.

However, it is understood that he is guilty of making repeated inappropriate comments he sees as ‘joke’.

Wallace, who defended himself on Tuesday, apologized to ‘from time to time that my humor and a part of my humor and tongue were inappropriate’.

Gregg Wallace was banned from working at BBC after deciding that they did not trust that you could change learned behaviors.

In a letter of dismissal, the company clearly stated that he would not work as a BBC server after an investigation into the 60 -year -old Wallace's behavior of Masterchef.

In a letter of dismissal, the company clearly stated that he would not work as a BBC server after an investigation into the 60 -year -old Wallace’s behavior of Masterchef.

The letter of dismissal from the BBC obtained by Telegraph, the company’s’ flagship BBC show ‘that you are a presenter’ and ‘your comments on the reputation of the BBC’nin the impact of the impact of’, he said.

He continued: ‘I also consider whether your behavior can be improved with education and/or coaching.

‘However, after reviewing the findings of 2025, I do not trust that you can change the behaviors that seem to have been learned to do what you perceive as a joke in the working environment without understanding the limits of the appropriate.’

‘I should also think that various people in BBC talk to you about your behavior throughout your career and that you have already received education/coaching in 2019.’

The letter added: ‘I took the findings of 2025 into consideration about your health and the diagnosis of the last autism (as you explained to the public).

‘I stated that you do not think that certain environments are’ safe ‘for you. In addition to the maintenance task for you, the BBC is the use of contributors, public members and production teams that you may be interested in, and the use of colleagues in a safe working environment for everyone.

‘The findings of the 2025 reflect that some of your comments are uncomfortable or upset, but they are lacking awareness of what you struggle to distinguish between the appropriate and inappropriate behavior in the workplace and why your behavior affects others.’

`I do not trust that your behavior may change in order to ensure that it is a safe and respectful environment for others working with you in the types of program that BBC is trying to offer.

The BBC said that Wallace took into account the diagnosis of autism, but 'struggling to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate behavior'.

The BBC said that Wallace took into account the diagnosis of autism, but ‘struggling to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate behavior’.

Wallace was detonated by disabled charity institutions because he used his autism as an excuse for inappropriate behavior.

Wallace was detonated by disabled charity institutions because he used his autism as an excuse for inappropriate behavior.

‘Such productions are not intensively scenario programs, and contain a solid and consistent level of judicial level in relation to interactions with others who cannot be monitored or not continuously.’

Wallace was detonated by disabled charities because he used his autism as an excuse for his inappropriate behavior.

On Tuesday, he claimed that television executives could ‘not investigate my disability’ or ‘they could not protect me because I realized that it was a dangerous environment now’.

Fifty people came to the fore with new claims about Wallace, including inappropriate sexual comments about Wallace this week.

Now Wallace, a leading charity, was told that the diagnosis of autism was not ‘a free transition for bad behavior’, while others warned that their comments are at risk of stamping the autistic society.

Seema Flower, the founder of Blind ambition with disabilities, told BBC News that there was no ‘excuse’ because it was inappropriate for people in society.

“Where does we leave us as an excuse to behave?” he asked.

Emily Banks, the founder of Enna, the educational organ of neurodiversity, condemned Wallace.

He said: ‘Being open: Being autistic is never an excuse for abuse. This does not eliminate anyone and certainly does not mean that you cannot say the difference between right and wrong. ‘

Dan Harris, who manages his neuro -endeavor in the business world and is autistic, can sometimes miss social clues. But autism is not a free transition for bad behaviors, ‘he said.

‘Such comments stamp us and add an unfortunate negative focus to our community.’

On Wednesday, Wallace Friends said that he was partially responsible for the inappropriate behavior of his autism, because it was claimed that the situation could not wear underwear because of autistic hypersensitivity to labels and tight clothes’.

Times is said to have the autism ‘filter and boundaries’.

A BBC spokesman told Mailonline: ‘Banijay UK instructed Lewis Silkin to organize an investigation against the allegations against Gregg Wallace.’

‘We will not comment until the investigation is completed and the findings are published.’

In response to the latest claims, Wallace spokesman said: ‘Gregg continues to cooperate with the ongoing Banijay UK review and refused to enter the behavior of a sexual harassment nature, as mentioned earlier.’

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button