Greyhound Racing NSW doesn’t like people watching races
Normally, for those who want such entertainment, you can watch that the condemnation is forced to compete on a giant screen in any adhesive carpet, VIP salon ornamental drinking drink in the country. Or, you don’t need to get involved in your home: just download a gambling app or use websites of government grapes such as Greyhound Racing NSW or Greyhound Racing Victoria to live live races or live races in Queensland, Queensland.
However, it turns out that Greyhound Racing NSW prefers not to see many races.
Author and researcher Susan Metcalfe uses Twitter Examine the industry data to monitor the scores of the dogs injured every week during the race, publish images of how they were injured, check the official reports about the racing results for the details of their injuries, and then see what happened to the injured dogs. Some dogs are seriously injured in falls and euthanasia for collisions. However, many of the less seriously injured were killed by owners who prefer not to spend money on the veterinarian invoices, and the details of the fate of hunters were quietly died of “euthanasia” or “injuries”.
This is a detailed accountability that the industry refuses to achieve. Likewise, the Piss-Weak Regulator Greyhound Welfare Integrity Commission, a very independent organ CEO moved to Greyhound Racing NSW Earlier this year.
However, last week, Grnsw’s Legal Counsel Frank Krstan sent to Metcalfe to overthrow almost all GRNSW images, to Grnsw in a week and sent his images again to confirm that he never sent images.
“Please get advice, Kr Krstan wrote in the former GWIC CEO, copying,“ This demand is not complied with, may result in more action, may result in more action, including X, including an official complaint, including an official complaint. 1988 Digital Millennium Copyright Law, Regarding the legal procedures for removal procedures and/or copyright violations. ”(We recommend Krstan to skip the trouble to get x to do something).
Grnsw’s spokesman told Crirase: “MS Metcalfe was asked not to use GRNSW copyright material many times and rejected it… Mrs. Metcalfe can elaborate everything he wants and give hope with real evidence rather than the advice on what can happen in the future without using Grnsw copyright material.”
This is a uncomfortable reference that Metcalfe’s injuries that dogs are exposed to often, with the time they do not kill him ”with the period when the industry expects to be out of action. The problem is that Metcalfe is often right: According to Grnsw, 16 dogs in NSW were killed after track accidents in 2024-25.
With Metcalfe’s elaboration of the brutal reality of fate visited by the industry by the industry, we thought that the right to royalties was the least of Grnsw’s concerns. As Grnsw accepted, only the facts are not a problem. Metcalfe shows what really happens in the race: despite the lightly protectors of the scary, usually stomach contradictory accidents, especially in the stomach contradictory accidents, which leave the dogs, broken thorns and broken limbs that can reach 50-60km/s, especially after a pile on the track.
These terrible images do not want Grnsw to see people to see and willing to prevent people from seeing.
And remember that this is an industry supported by the government. As Grnsw said Crirase“In 2018, the government allocated $ 30 million to raise the runways to make them safe. This capital continues to be implemented by the sector.”
An interesting choice for GRNSW: spend the money given to them by taxpayers to make their exploitation really safe or threaten to threaten people showing how insecure it is.
Description: The author contributed to the mass -based legal fund of Susan Metcalfe.
