Have Israel and USA made the case for pre-emptive self-defence?

When he keeps you next to the Bosphorus, he asks for your money when he demands your money. Self -defense Negative To make the mother run her in the parking lot, because the game looked at you in a threatening way.

The United Nations and the World War II and the Holocaust ashes have been established, because the regulations were established, because the world was fully monster and acknowledged that the school yard should either be self -regulated or burned to the ground.

Among the new rules settled in the UN charter, there was a new understanding of the conditions that would justify a nation -state to go to war against someone else. Article 51 maintains the natural right of collective or individual self -defense if an armed attack occurs against the member state, while Article 2 confirms the prohibition of the use of force against anyone in an inconsistency for the purpose of the UN.

Together, the principle is the basis: unless it is approved by the UN Security Council, military aggression is illegal, but except for a limited armed attack.

Israel’s bombing against Iran was justified as a self -defense act of self -defense: preventive. Israel said that Iran would take nuclear weapons and later used them against Israel that it was so great that it was a self -defense act to eliminate the threat. After demolishing, the US runs the same line.

There are realpolytic arguments that Israel can work and to justify its actions as since its establishment in 1948. Israel claims legal reasons as a lawsuit and ignores the law. Practical/political facts often use it by Israel and defenders as defense against international law violations, but not such a thing. In fact, they are arguments that international law does not work.

There is no preventive self -defense doctrine, which is explicitly accepted in international law, but in modern times, it is easy to see that the division of hair between a real attack and a clear close attack can sometimes be controversial. If an Iran was really a minute for midnight of its nuclear strike, it could be a good case for Israel’s pre -orders.

It is not evidence of this, but it is a fact that Israel has declared the same threat for more than a decade. This is not to defend the terrible regime of Iran or its inhuman intentions from opaque, but the preventive self -defense case has not been explained to the satisfaction of any of the international law experts who consider it.

Israel’s claims have been weakened in any case with their own actions. Nuclear threat did not stop or not stop; He bombed energy production infrastructure, air defense and missile systems and targeted individuals, including scientists and military leaders. His movements are consistent with self -defense against Iran’s war actions, which Israel does not define.

As for the US, there is no defense; The attack on Iran cannot be considered as defense on any basis. It may be ascended to point out the slogans of “Death to America olan, which has been part of the cultural imposition of the regime since 1979. Iran had not attacked America or its existence, and the United States had no obligation to join Israel, even if he acted in defense of himself. Those who call Trump call the “Iran again wonderful yeniden, regime change, emphasizes that this has nothing to do with the defense of anything.

While we were shifting towards another major war against the buildings that are represented wrongly, we insist on clarity, which is exemplified by the declaration of JD Vance’s declaration that America was not in war with Iran, that Iran was not in war with Iran’s nuclear program, and we refuse to retreat to Warmongers’ poppy word. It’s just sophisticated.

It is incredibly disappointed to see that our government continues to shift away from Australia as a champion of the international order based on rules. When Richard Marles, Penny Wong and Sussan Ley were asked for a bombing campaign, they fell to them with reflexive hasty to refer to Israel’s right to self -defense. Wong isn’t that stupid.

Trump is so stupid and more. A break was given by Netanyahu, all he had to do was to go down to drag the presidential ego from the promise of more foreign war, and now we are a few minutes away from another coalition that will be willing here.

None of these can stop Iran’s bombardment or insisting that others cannot call it a precedent in the future. But precedent.

In the end, it is not known whether these aggressive war actions by Israel and the United States have prevented anything more terrible otherwise. It can be known that they have given a fatal wound to the structure of international law and that they have given a license to return to all nations to the forest law.