Trump’s Epstein Fiasco Worsens as Dems Suddenly Find Big New Weapon
Desperate times may require desperate measures, but they also call the creative ones. A criminal president and the democrats, who face the majority of a GOP congress, which is dedicated to closing all kinds of transparency and accountability for him, will have to be increasingly resourceful in their efforts to crack from this front. Very temporary good news is that they actually have the options to do it.
So you should pay attention news Senate democrats now use a law that rarely used to force transparency in the so -called Epstein files.
New York Times reports Seven Democrats at the Committee of Internal Security and State Affairs of the Upper Chamber sent a letter to Doja, Jeffrey Epstein, dated 2019, using a regulation for decades, and to deliver the information compiled by Jeffrey Epstein for sex purposes for sexual purposes:
Under a part of federal law The state institutions, which are widely called “five rules ında in the Senate, require five members of this committee, which is the chief surveillance panel of the room, they must provide information.
. letter Epstein’s “audio and video recordings” and much more, including DEJ or FBI -related documents, files, evidence, or other materials related to the publication of the DOBI or other materials describing exactly what the democrats require the publication.
This is a good move. Let’s start with the law in question: states If “any five members of this Senate committee request any information on any subject within the jurisdiction of that committee, the relevant executive agency will“ send it ”. There is a provision that accompanies for the Assembly.
Here a historical parallel is worth drawing attention. This 1928 law was adopted after Teapot Dome scandal. David VladeckA professor of government in Georgetown. This scandal, which includes a corrupt cabinet member who bribes under oil rentals under President Warren Harding, is higher need for better congress supervision to ensure the corruption and transparency of the state.
Critically, critically, the statutes that the Senate democrats are currently calling, Vlalack, initially says that the “minority has designed to enable the“ executive agencies do ”in real way.
House GOP leaders literally Turn off the vote Whether or not he will release Epstein ingredients. And when there messy indications It is easy to imagine when some Republicans want to force more transparency in the White House this fall, especially if Trump ordered to stand up and when they did not come.
Join this new effort by the Senate Democrats. There are reasons to think that you can do it a little well.
Obviously the Ministry of Justice will ignore the demand. However, the Senate Democrats can try to take the administration to court. Congress Bilgin Norman Ornstein said to me, “The Ministry of Justice has to comply.” “If they refuse, the Senate Democrats must sue the Chief Public Prosecutor and the Ministry of Justice so that they do not comply with the law.”
Democratic leader Chuck Schumer seems to accept Democrats for his approved a press conference on Wednesday. “This law, Sch Schumer said. “These courts can be challenged.”
Congress Procedure Specialist Sarah Binder, the whole issue will open what the courts say, he said. “The statute is very clear–agencies -A Provide these documents, Bind Binder said to me. “ The question will agree that the courts have filed a lawsuit against a group of senators, unlike the entire room. “
There is the reason for cautious optimism. The home democrats went quite further when they were tried for the last time. In 2017, the charter called on the first Trump administration to force the Trump International Hotel to force many ethical issues to the agenda.
Particularly, a Court of Appeal decided that democrats had survived to bring this case. And even the Supreme Court accepted To hear the case in 2023. But because this is never the democrats last The case after receiving the documents they are looking for.
Now the same question can be taken into consideration by the Supreme Court only in the Epstein case this time. Vlalack, who took part in previous cases, thinks that it was likely, because the courts have already paved the ground for a very relevant ground in this case. The appeal courts would manage the courts in the same way, and as a result, a “this case” or such a person like this would have to ıyla to reach the high court ”.
Obviously, he predicts how the Supreme Court will manage. However, constant legal efforts like this will ensure that the media focuses on what the administration is. refusal To do this scandal in the face of the great interest to reach the bottom. And he will focus on what the courts do.
Ornstein says, “Courts can deal with it, but it clearly says’ I don’t care about the law.
I claimed that there was a real value in such efforts from the minority. They can be constructive if they give new information to the public, or if others do not bring responsibility. Like Marcy Wheeler NotesIt can also help break the clutter.
The failure of accountability is all over the Epstein issue. After the campaign on the promise of transparency, with the active help of the President – GOP – a ring of child predators prevents the explanation of information containing information containing some of the richest and most powerful people in the world, including the president himself.
It is easy to give up congress supervision. However, democrats have very creative options. No matter how desperate it seems to be, we shouldn’t overlook it, we need to do Trump’s dirty job for him. Democrats: Stay on it and do not allow it.
