Here are 5 major Supreme Court cases to be argued this fall

Washington – The Supreme Court opens its new era on Monday and is scheduled to have discussions in 33 cases this fall.

Justice will have difficulties for transsexual rights, voting rights and Trump tariffs and reconsider an 90 -year -old precedent of independent agency officials from being expelled by the President.

Here are the important situations for discussion:

Transformation Therapy and Free Speech: Does a licensed mental health consultant have the right to speak with patients under the age of 18 to change sexual orientation or gender identity?

In 2012, California was the first state to prohibit “transformation therapy”, believing that it was harmful to minors and led to depression and suicide. Other states were followed based on the powers of regulating medicine and prohibiting non -standard care.

Freedom of defense, a Christian law group, filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Colorado Advisor and argued that the state “censored”. (Chiles vs salazarWill be discussed on Tuesday.)

Voting rights and black majority regions: Does a state violate the constitution if a state redefits the regions of the congress to create a black majority region?

In the past, the Court said that racial Gerrymandering was contrary to the constitution. However, by referring to the Voting Rights Law, he decided that states should sometimes have a good chance to win a black or Latin candidate.

Otherwise, these minorities may be closed from political representation in congress, state legislative bodies or district boards.

However, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the whole race in drawing the lines of the region has forbade the use of the whole race, and the Court may adopt its view in a disagreement waiting on a second black majority zone in Louisiana. (Louisiana and CallaisWill be discussed on October 15th.)

Trump and Tariffs: President Trump, otherwise, has the legal authority moving on its own to apply large import taxes to products from friendly countries?

Trump relys on the 1977 law, which enables the President to take action when he encounters a “unusual and extraordinary threat” from abroad. Measure does not mention tariffs or taxes.

In a pair of cases, the sub -courts decided that the tariffs were illegal, but for now, he kept. Trump management lawyers argue that justice should be postponed to the president because tariffs include foreign relations and national security. (Learning Sources and TrumpIt will be discussed on November 5

The Supreme Court will look at whether transsexual athletes can compete in certain sports. Above, a 100 -meter obstacle activity during a runway meeting in Riverside in April.

(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

Transsexual athletes and school sports: Can a state prevent a transsexual student who prevents the competition in a boy’s sports team?

Western Virginia and Idaho adopted such laws, but were shot by judges who said that the Constitution had violated the Federal Title IX law, which prevented the protection of equal laws and sex discrimination in schools and colleges.

Trump voiced support to özleme keeping men away from women’s sports – – a characterization that is considered incorrectly by transsexual women and advocates. If the Supreme Court accepts it, it is likely to be implemented by the country in accordance with the title IX. (West Virginia and BPJ Will be heard in December.)

Trump and Independent Agencies: Can the President of the independent agencies assigned by the congress under fixed conditions could be the Fire Brigade officials?

Since 1887, the congress has formed semi -independent boards, commissions and agencies with regulatory tasks. When the authorities are appointed by the President and the new president takes over, the fixed conditions hold them on duty.

The Supreme Court approved its independence from direct presidential control against the US in the 1935 Humphreys execution case, but Trump expelled several such authorities.

The current court was on the side of Trump in such two cases and will hear arguments as to whether or not to overthrow the 90 -year -old peer. (Trump and Slaughter Will be discussed in December.)