USA

‘How did it get so much f‑‑‑ing worse?’

The moderate republicans and challenging conservatives in the Assembly express an increasing opposition to the “great, beautiful invoice” version of the Senate’s lower room, which is a scary dynamic legislation to meet the deadline of Friday, which has been imposed on GOP leaders.

On Monday, the Senate launched a voting vote with the members, taking into account a series of changes in the lower room, including changes in Medicaid deductions and tax provisions. The upper room is expected to vote on Tuesday morning.

While the parliamentary deputies watch the Senate’s negotiations with anxiety, they are gushing about the status of the legislation.

“In text chains, telephone conversation, everyone complains,” The Hill said. “There are a few small provisions for people to say something positive, but no one is satisfied with the Senate version.”

“It is incredible for many of us – how much worse?” they added.

Live Updates: Senate discusses Trump’s Megabill in voting-ram.

MP, GOP leadership and the White House calls to skeptical republicans and more conservative regions to raise the problems related to some provisions reached moderate to the agenda – emphasizing the depth of concerns in the conference, he said.

Since they publish concerns about the changes in Medicaid and the return of green energy tax loans, at least six moderate parliamentary republican, they plan to vote on the current invoice in the Senate Law.

The Senate Law contains an offer that will be able to meet 3.5 percent of the provider taxes for states that expand Medicaid under the available maintenance law until 2031. In green energy tax loans, the return of subsidies is slightly less harsh in the Senate bill, but if a certain percentage of its components comes from China, the version of the upper room adds a new tax to the sun and wind projects.

Representatives David Valadao (R-Calif.), Jeff van Drew (Rn.j.) and Young Kim (R-Calif.) Are currently a “no de in the legislation due to these provisions. Representative Nick Lalota (RN.Y.), in the meantime, said that the Senate was opposed to the cutting of the bill due to the language and local tax (salt) deduction limit.

“I think it’s just a bad public policy,” Van Drew said at the beginning of this month after explaining the Senate language. “If you hurt these hospitals, some will close, some people will have to use the emergency rooms even more.… This is political stupidity; this political suicide.”

For now, moderates closely monitor the voting on a change that will prevent new registers in Medicaid expansion situations from receiving 9 to 1 advanced federal medical assistance (FMAP) and prevent a change in the Social Security Net Program.

Although the senate majority leader John Thune (RS.D.) supports the change as a part of an agreement to help scott and other GOP waiting on Saturday, it is likely to collect sufficient support for the change of change.

In the meantime, the house quietly, the package will make the package dead in the house, hoping to squeak Tweak. Some deputies in the lower room, the verdict was a red line for them, he said.

“Most of us want the FMAP change to pass, so it will be the last nail in the coffin,” he said.

On the other side of the ideological spectrum, an angry conservative republicans on the level of expenditure interruptions on the design and the clear influence as a result. The conservative home freedom, which contains several critics of the bill, sent a shot along the bow on Monday.

“The household budget frame was open: there is no new open expenditure on a big beautiful bill. The version of the Senate adds 651 billion dollars to the exposure – and this is before the interest costs that double the sum of the total” He wrote on the social platform x. “This is not financial responsibility. This is not what we accept.”

“The Senate should make major changes and at least it should be in the basketball field that adapts to the budget framework, at least,” he added. “Republicans should do better.”

Rep.

Orum I know that the president has a big agenda to move things again. I want to accelerate it. “Yes, I can’t vote, because everyone says that we should do it until July 4th.

A similar note came, saying that the representative of the group, the representative of the group, said that the Senate wanted the Senate to return to the parliament framework and that the measure wanted to vote against the procedural rule while passing through the house.

“I think the contract is to return to the house frame, Self Self said. “This is what everyone is committed to, I know that the speaker is talking to the senate majority leader, so we will see what will happen.”

Conferences from both ends of the GOP Conference are growing more pronounced to complete the work in the package according to the deadline of 4 July, under the pressure of President leaders-President Trump.

The Senate is expected to vote at the legislation early on Tuesday morning when the challenging voting process ends. If the bill passes, the Parliamentary Rules Committee can be gathered early on Tuesday afternoon to undertake the legislation, according to a source, according to a source that initiated the process in the lower room. Later, the floor votes can be held on Wednesday at 9 am, House Majornity Whip Tom Embmer’s (R-Minn.) Office told MPs on Sunday night.

As the leaders move forward exactly, some MPs hit breaks and propose the party to push the timeline back to continue negotiations.

Roy On Monday, on Monday, “Instead of force this week, we need to make conversations we need with the Senate, see what they are doing, we need to review the bill, find out where we can find savings, find what we can adjust in the tax policy and make the map really collected, Roy said Roy.

Go to the hill for the latest news, weather, sports and flow video.