Iran faces reimposition of sanctions after UN vote
After rejecting a draft decision that would extend the suspension of the Security Council in New York, the re -placement of the sanctions of the United Nations on Iran approached.
Unless the last-minute agreement with Iran is reached, it is expected that the economic sanctions implemented between 2006-2010 are expected to enter into force on 28 September.
The United Kingdom, known as Germany, France and collective states, triggered the so -called “Snapback” sanction mechanism by accusing Iran of serious violations of the 2015 nuclear agreement in late August.
In addition to other violations, they talk about uranium enrichment far beyond the levels required for civilian purposes.
As expected, the draft decision put forward by South Korea to relax the sanctions, did not win nine necessary votes in the 15 -member council.
Russia and China were among the countries that provided the sanctions to relax.
Iran strongly condemned the UN decision.
“Iran reserves the right to respond in accordance with this action,” Iran State News Agency IRNA said in a statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He said.
The UN mission of Iran also accused the US and E3 of taking the way to rise instead of reason and therefore being responsible for the results.
The three European states still have until the end of the next week to negotiate concessions that may prevent sanctions from entering into force.
However, diplomats are currently not likely to have such a result.
French UN Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont said that three European countries continue to look for a solution with Iran, but they are not yet a “satisfactory answer to their demands.
Meanwhile, Britain rejected the claim that Russia did not have the right to re -place sanctions from Europeans.
Iran presented a new offer in the vote.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on Thursday at the end of X and wrote to the three European countries the previous day that he offered a “reasonable and actable plan” aimed at “preventing an unnecessary and preventive crisis” in the coming days.
Araghchi mentioned a creative, fair and balanced offer that deals with real concerns and mutually beneficial “without giving any details about its content.
Speaking in Geneva, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh threatened that his country would play “strategic cards” if the UN sanctions were restored.
Although Khatibzadeh did not make any special plans at the press conference, he made it clear that Iran has seen withdrawing from the Nuclear Evacuation Treaty (NPT) as one of the options.
The Treaty prohibits non -nuclear countries from buying nuclear weapons and is forced to disarm nuclear forces.
Khatibzadeh accused the E3 of the Snapback mechanism of fuel in the Middle East.
“What Europeans do is politically prejudiced and motivated, legally illegal, international illegitimate and strategically wrong.” He said.
The 2015 Iran’s nuclear agreement was seen as an important tool to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons at that time.
As the US President, Donald Trump withdrew the US in 2018 in 2018, and Iran responded to enrichment, especially by violating the provisions of the agreement.
Observer believes that Iran can retaliate by restricting the work of Iran’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), withdrawing from the NPT, or even explaining that it will continue to build a nuclear weapon.
With the bombing of Israel and the US facilities, IAEA before the June war, Irana, enriched to 60 percent, far beyond civil needs and said that 90 percent of 90 percent for a nuclear weapon enriched 60 percent.
With AP
