Iran strikes mark Trump’s biggest foreign policy gamble
US President Donald Trump, who participated in a direct attack on Israel’s regional belt fave with the decision to bomb the nuclear places of Iran, has done something that he had swore for a long time to intervene in a major foreign war.
The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of the deep underground of Iran’s most intense -strengthened nuclear installation, is full of risk and unknowns of the largest foreign policy gambling of Trump’s two presidencies.
On Saturday, Trump insisted that Iran should now make peace or attack more.
However, strikes may cause Tehran to provoke Tehran by closing the Hormuz Strait, the world’s most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, accelerating the missile dam on Israel and activating the Proxy groups against US and Israel interests around the world.
Such movements awaken the echoes of the “wars of wars forever” in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has promised that Trump mocked as “stupid” and never dragged.
While led to the bombing, the US President had objected to the renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach an agreement to eliminate the threats of military action and the nuclear program.
A senior White House official said Trump Tehran was not interested in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided that the strikes were “the right thing to be done”.
After Trump made sure that there was a “high probability of success”, Iran’s nuclear and military facilities caused Israeli air strikes for more than a week.
However, some experts, although Iran’s nuclear program has returned for years, the threat may be far from ending.
Iran refused to look for a nuclear weapon, saying that the program was completely peaceful purposes.
“The long -term military action is likely to push Iran to determine that nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in Washington’s diplomacy,” a non -US -centered organization defending the arms control legislation. He said.
Immediately after the US strikes, Iran showed little appetite for concessions.
Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow the “national industry” to be developed, and the Iranian state television commentator said that every US citizen or military member in the region will now be legitimate targets.
Some analysts suggested that Trump, who had previously rejected the purpose of displacement of Iranian leadership, could seek “regime change” if Tehran made movements to build large retaliations or nuclear weapons.
“Make sure the mission is creeping, aiming for the replacement and democratization campaigns,” he said, “Make sure the mission is,” he said. “You will find the bones of many unsuccessful US moral duty buried in the Middle East sand.”
Jonathan Panikoff, the former US -former Intelligence Officer of the Middle East, said that if he felt forced to survive Iran’s leadership, he would quickly enter “disproportionate attacks”.
However, Tehran said he would have to pay attention to the results. Although actions such as closing the Hormuz Strait will cause problems for Trump with higher oil prices and potential US inflationary influence, it would harm China, one of Iran’s few strong allies.
At the same time, Trump will already face a strong push against the Iranian attack from the congress democrats, and at the same time, the Republican Maga base will have to fight the opposition from the anti-muhaleci wing of the base.
Trump’s slogan “Peace through Power” will be tested more than ever before, with the promises of rapid termination of wars in Ukraine and Gaza, especially after opening a new military front after not meeting his campaign.
