How Trump’s Praise, Israel’s Claims And A Global Fallout Are Rewriting The Iran Nuclear Narrative | World News
Israel-Iran conflict: During a media briefing at the NATO Summit, US President Donald Trump made a buzzing statement of global diplomatic corridors. When asked if he would think of alleviating sanctions on Iran, he did not respond with policy speech or threats. Instead, he accepted Iran’s courage during the last hostility. “They fought Grit,” he said.
He talked about Iran’s struggle. A battered nation. Those who try to heal. “If they want to sell oil, let them sell oil. They need money to rebuild,” Trump said.
His tone hit an unusual mix of tightness and flexibility. Next week, he confirmed a conversation with Iranian authorities.
“Maybe we’re making an agreement. Maybe we’re not. They’ve returned to their world for now, Tr Trump said.
Then the notification came – “There will be no nuclear weapons. This was done. We destroyed it.”
Israel Fordow Nuclear Site ‘Dead’ announced
As Trump’s words settled, Israel acted with sensitivity. The Israeli Atomic Energy Commission has announced that the Fordow nuclear facility in Iran – the long symbol of Tehran’s nuclear ambition for a long time – is now completely disabled.
Israel claimed that American and Israeli strikes have devastated the key structures on the field. In the report, “the total damage to the infrastructure,” he said.
According to Israel, the coordinated attack dragged Iran’s nuclear program back several years. The assessment warned that if Iran’s access to nuclear materials is prevented, the deterioration may be uncertain.
US spark’s head leaks
However, an early assessment classified from the Pentagon drew a different picture. Intelligence examination suggested that strikes can only cause limited disruptions – perhaps not months.
The nuclear program implied by the report was far from being crippled. Trump reduced the leak. “CNN and New York Times are emitting fake news,” he pulled.
Russia comes out of cooperation
Air attacks also shook Iran’s allies. Russia made a sharp movement. Authorized, the United Nations will restrict cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Nuclear Activity Observer.
Dmitry Peskov, the spokesman of the Kremlin, attributed the decision to what he calls “unmaded” strikes on Iran’s nuclear areas. He accused the West of weakening Iaea’s reliability.
For Russia, the US attack on three nuclear facilities in Iran passed a line. It was as political as a diplomatic divorce. Moscow had previously condemned the strikes, but Iaea had not implied to cut off his ties. This week’s output was a big change.
Previously, the Iranian Parliament announced that it was out of IAEA.
China warns nuclear disaster
Beijing came in. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang spoke to Iran’s best diplomat Abbas Araghchi. His speeches watched a strong warning from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.
His spokesman Lin Jian sent it to the X, calling Strily a “serious violation of the UN Charter. He said the attack could trigger a nuclear disaster. “International society should oppose it,” he read.
China’s official statement strengthened Iran’s support for the right to sovereignty and national security. The language was pointed out. So was the intention. Beijing called on the restoration of real ceasefire and peace in the Middle East.
Where does the conflict go from here
Trump’s praise of Iran’s courage. Israel’s claim to a destroyed nuclear facility. Pentagon leaks a darker picture. Sudden sprinkling Russia with IAEA. And China is an upcoming nuclear fear of mishap. The latest strikes in Iran did more than the damage shelters. They have opened a new part of the global reorganization, and deep fractures about how nations perceive power, diplomacy and nuclear restriction.
The world is watching. Interviews were promised. However, once again trust remains on a shaky ground.
