Justice Department sues California, other states that have declined to share voter rolls

The US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against California Foreign Minister Shirley Weber on Thursday for not delivering voter rolls of the state, and claimed that the federal authorities were compliance with the state’s federal voting arrangements and protecting federal elections against fraud.

The Ministry of Justice also rejected the demands of Weber’s colleagues in Michigan, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania for voter rolls.

“Clean voter rolls are the basis of free and fair elections”. General Pam Bondi said in a statement in the case. “Each state’s voter registrations have the responsibility to ensure that it is accurate, accessible and secure – States that do not fulfill this obligation will see this Ministry of Justice in court.”

In his case against the state’s best election official, Weber, the Ministry of Justice argues that the states are accused of ensuring that the states have appropriate protocols to record voters and to protect accurate and up-to-date rolls, and therefore they are caused by access to state voter rolls to ensure that they are protected.

“The United States had to take instant action to seek legal solutions to refuse to comply with legal demands under the Federal Law, the case,” the United States said.

Weber, in his statement, the case called “A Fisheries Discovery Trip for Partizan Policy Objectives and Excuse”, called a “open extreme access” and “an unseen intervention with laws or the US Department of Justice, an unseen intervention”.

“US Department of Justice, California officials, 23 million California voters by trying to leave the private and personal information of the state of California province and trying to use the federal court system to erode the rights of the citizens,” he said.

The California law requires state officials to “protect our voters’ sensitive private information ve and that the Ministry of Justice cannot provide sufficient legal authority to justify the interventionist demands ,, but also the federal authorities to come to the Sacramento and to ignore the invitations from the state.

Ministry of Justice “California’s Current Electronic Copy of the Voter Registration List throughout the state -of -the -side state -wide; “All Repeating Records in Imperial, Los Angeles, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, Siskiou and Stanislaus districts” lists; List List of all reciprocal registrations that have been removed from the voter registration list throughout the state ”and lifting dates.

In addition, the voters in the state demanded a list of all records canceled because they died; A statement for a recent decline in the number of “non -active” voters recorded in the state; and “All records, including the date of birth, the driver’s license number and the last four social security numbers, which were canceled due to the lack of a citizen of the registration.

The case is the last move to push the Trump administration’s demands on voting policies to the individual states that are extensively assigned to the individual states under the Constitution by managing their own elections.

In March, Trump follows the executive order by Trump, which is allegedly reshaping the voting rules throughout the country, including asking voters to ensure citizenship evidence and to ignore state votes that are not taken according to the election day.

The Emir, which was rejected by Trump for years, in which the US voting system is currently allowing widespread fraud and abuse and endangered the election results, including the loss of 2020 to Joe Biden, and rejected by experts.

He filed a lawsuit to prevent various voting groups and 19 state orders, including California.

Defending groups say that their requirements to prove the order and especially citizenship will deprive legal US citizen voters who do not have access to define documents such as passports and real identities. They said that the prohibition of the adoption of the post -voting compasses taken after the election day would create obstacles for voters in the big state in need of time to process large amounts of votes such as California.

California is currently mail with election day and accepts votes if it is taken within a certain number of days.

California Atty. General Rob Bond called Trump’s executive order as a “illegal power” that they will fight like hell ”to stop California and other states. His office, the US Department of Justice’s case against Weber refers to Weber’s office.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office did not respond to comments.

US assistant. Gen. Harmeet K. Dhillon, clean voters’ to protect American citizens from voting and abuse and the state’s elections in accordance with the proper, integrity and laws of the trust in the need to regain the need for a lawsuit.

In April, Trump’s executive order, “an illegal initiative against states and the Constitutional authority over elections,” Weber said he would not bend by the case on Thursday.

“The sensitive data of California citizens should not be used as a political tool to weaken the trust of the public and the integrity of the elections,” he said. “I will always stand with California to protect the federal excessive access rights of the states and the sensitive personal information of our voters. California deserve better. America deserves better.”