Kalyani family feud: Sugandha tells court younger brother illegally transferred assets

Industrialist Baba Kalyani’s sister Sugandha Hiremath Kalyani claimed that his younger brother Gaurishankar Kalyani had transmitted his family assets “fraudulent” in Karada, a city in Satara near Pune.

On Friday, a new statement opened in a Pune Civil Court, Sugandha, Gaurishankar’s fathers Dr. The 2008 lawyer (POA) given by Neelkanth Kalyani claimed that he misleaded his power (POA). Mint He saw a copy of the declaration.

Sugandha claimed that POA was only to manage assets and that it was replaced in an honest way to include gifts and transfer powers. He presented court statements from Prakash Honrao, an employee of Gaurishankar, and admitted that he was forced to accept Poa and carried out transfers under the pressure of Gaurishankar’s wife Rohini Kalyani.

The declaration, after discovering the allegation of “fraud”. Neelkanth said that Kalyani had canceled POA in 2009 and started the legal proceedings in a court in Karad.

Sugandha also accused Gaurishankar and Baba Kalyani of secretly handing over other common family beings and hiding them from the court.

“On the one hand, my brothers and sisters continue to convey the presence of the common family core and the status of the Kalyani family Huf (Hindu Unpaid Family) characteristics and in the same breath, both my brother – father and gaurishankar – recently, as average of all kinds of souls,” he said. Before the Pune Court, the declaration hearing the department team.

Answering the queries sent by e -mail about the declaration, the spokesman of Baba Kalyani Mint “Although the lawsuits opened a dam, Sugandha Hiremath could not get a single order in favor of the courts by proving the mistake of his allegations”.

The spokesman added that the allegations against Baba Kalyani were “fundamental and malicious” and “categorically rejected”.

Background

In March, Sugandha called his share in the family’s deck and had the case. He decided to prevent his brothers from alienating any of their family assets, including various properties and 250 companies throughout the country. He also sought a court order from his siblings to explain the details of all family properties.

Considering the relationship between the nature of the case, the property of the case and the obsession of other proceedings, the parties thought it would be appropriate to hear all parties before passing any order.

The Pune Court had previously refused to make a precautionary precautionary decision on asset transfers, but Sugandha is now calling new restrictions in the light of new evidence.

The problem will then be heard on July 22.