Keir Stamer’s reaction to Rachel Reeves’ sobbing showed 1 clear thing – disaster for UK | Politics | News
Let’s go back to the day for almost a year. Keir Starmer and Co. After a historical election win, he was absolutely happy when they exploded champagne mushrooms, claiming that they would solve all the diseases of the country. Who could only predict that Starmer would be here later after 12 months. After the Chancellor Rachel Reeves, MPs, after providing a humiliating blow to the proposed welfare reforms, openly sobbing behind, rolled tears.
But we’re still here. I know that most of the country has no sympathy for Rachel, because it is now known. There are too many calamitous mishaps to start listing them. Say this way: The term of office so far so far is not synonymous with success. But by putting aside his terrible record, I can’t sympathize with the woman who has just hit me as someone who has surgery only in computer coding, but I am sympathetic.
I have been a member of the parliament for six years and I have lived all kinds of. In the council room, the members of the labor and conservative councils act like sworn enemies and deal with the best levels to go down the coup. Even in local politics, you need a thick skin and it puts it slightly. This is a brutal sport – and many will tell you: If it’s too hot, then get out of the kitchen.
However, what is not at all is to see that a member of the Assembly is clearly in trouble. Fortunately, my feelings never spilled in the council room. But I understand – and I don’t think there’s something to be ashamed. After all, we are all human.
Shouldn’t he have entered the room in the first place knowing that his emotions were close to foaming? Should he excuse himself, be a little cold -blooded and go back? Yes, yes. However, considering that he chooses to do any of these things, I think I think from his boss and in fact the others around him are shocking. If I were blubbed in the council room, I would expect the Council leader to temporarily pause the procedures from the Council leader.
So what actually happened? Why wasn’t Starmer had a courtesy to intervene? Why didn’t someone go to sit next to him, and he didn’t feel that he was part of a team that cared about him?
Today we got the answer. When a journalist was asked why he did not support the so -called reliable ally and the most powerful member of his cabinet, he is a weak excuse of Starmer, claiming he didn’t know what was going on.
He said he was very busy with answering questions.
“In the PMQs, it was like Bang Bang Bang … That was yesterday, and that’s why I was probably the last person to appreciate everything in the room.”
Crikey. If this is the level of rupture from his right lady, what does it say about the ability of a nation to read the feelings of a nation and manage England with a crisis that is not entirely out of its own crisis? Unfortunately, I think the answer is already clearly open a year after the elections
