Trump’s Iran dilemma exposes bitter split in president’s circle

The dilemma that the US should join Israel or remain out of aggression in an attack on Iran revealed divisions among US President Donald Trump’s supporters.

The President of the Republic is intending to help target the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic after the meeting with the national security advisors in the White House Chamber on Tuesday.

In the campaign footsteps, Trump was often afraid of the “stupid eternal wars” in the Middle East, but Iran claimed that “he could not be a nuclear weapon.”

The possibility of attracting the US to another stranger was painful against each other’s isolationist and hawk wings.

Tulsi Gabbard, Tulsi Gabbard, National Intelligence Director of Trump, said that Iran’s enriched uranium was at the highest level of all time before the Congress in March.

On June 10 – just three days before the Israeli strikes began to Iran – Gabbard published a video that “political distinguished and warmths were” carelessly frightening fear and tensions “with the risk of putting the world on the brink of nuclear destruction.

Gabbard’s video and previous comments, the video reported that “described” reported that the US News Outlet reported a slit of a slit between Trump.

Orum I don’t care what he said, Tr Trump said to the reporters when he asked his previous comments before the Congress. “I think they were very close to having weapons.”

Later, he accused CNN of removing his previous comments from the context, saying that he told CNN that he was “on the same page” with Trump.

Gabbard was not alone among the Republicans who criticized the US potential participation in the conflict.

On Tuesday, Conservative Republican Congress from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, with the Democrats to provide a bill to prevent Trump from meeting US forces with “unauthorized hostilities” without the approval of the congress.

“This is not our war. Even though, Congress should decide these issues according to our constitution, Mass Massie wrote.

A few advocates of Trump’s “first” doctrine promised to keep the United States away from the “forever wars” that led to the deaths of thousands of US soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Former FOX News presenter Tucker Carlson asked the United States to stay away from conflict with Iran.

At his podcast, he provoked a rebuke from Trump, who called Carlson “Kokype”.

Georgia Congress and Trump Sadık Marjorie Taylor Greene jumped to Carlson’s defense with the President with an extraordinary break.

He said that everyone who supports such an intervention is not “America first”.

During the interview between Carlson and Hawkish Texas senator Ted Cruz, the tensions exploded in a screaming match on Tuesday. Cruz became a defensive when asked if he knew the population of Iran and the ethnic mixture.

Carlson said: “You are a senator who wants the government to overthrow and you do not know anything about the country!”

Cruz said: “No, you don’t know anything about the country!”

Trump’s former political strategist Steve Bannon said at Carlson’s podcast, allowing the “deep state” to put the US to war with Iran, “Trump supporters will” blow up the coalition “.

“If we withdraw to this war, which seems to be inevitable on the war side, it will not only blow up the coalition, but will also prevent the most important thing that is the deportation of illegal foreign invaders that are here,” he said.

On Wednesday, however, Bannon said that he would trust the participants at a Christian scientific monitor event if he decided to give us strength to conflict.

“Maybe we hate it, but you know, we’re going to get on the ship.” he said.

Charlie Kirk, another conservative political commentator who describes him as closer to the “isolationist” side, said Trump’s “pragmatic” and “common sense” values ​​in X.

“I don’t know if President Trump will choose to include America against Iran,” Kirk said Kirk. “But he’s a man I believe to make this decision.”

Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell said the party was “a bad week for isolationists”.

“Some of the isolationist movements led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon, who are here, can help the Israelis to defeat Iranians,” McConnell told CNN. He said.

The other Warhawks in the party exercise Trump to target Iran.

Southern Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said that preventing Iran from receiving nuclear bombs is in the US national security interests. Tehran argues that the nuclear program is for peaceful, civilian purposes like energy.

“President Trump understands the threat of Ayatullah [Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei] He told us not only Israel, and at the end of the day he would help Israel to finish the job. “

Vice President JD Vance said in a social media mission that tries to bridge the division, that Trump can “decide that he should take more action to end Iran’s enrichment”.

“This decision ultimately belongs to the President.” “And of course, people have the right to worry about wandering strangers after the last 25 years of stupid foreign policy.”

In recent days, an idea survey shows that Trump voters will widely support the US in helping Israel attack Iran.

In the survey conducted by Gray House, 79% of the participants found that they would support the United States, which provides aggressive weapons to hit Israel’s Iranian military targets. 89 % of them were worried that Iran would obtain atomic bombs.

However, on the social media platform of Trump, many of them expressed concerns that the US could find itself involved in a Middle East conflict thousands of miles away.

“There is no war with Iran. No foreign war no longer,” he wrote a user. “America first!”

Another user warned that the US participation in Israeli operations may cost Republicans politically in the coming years.

“Don’t do this,” the user wrote. “If you do this, the Republicans will never win again.”

“We will quickly bring back the stability in the Middle East. And we will bring the world back to peace,” Trump said, while campaigning for the White House.

With Iran-Israel’s clash on the edge of the knife, the question of whether the US President is an isolationist or interventionist can be answered earlier.