Labour delegates are strangers to sound economic sense as an alcoholic is to sobriety. That’s why they’ll lap up the Burnham blueprint, writes ANDREW NEIL

This weekend, the Labor Party came together for the annual conference in Liverpool, the Labor Party is in the grasp of a low -level civil war that threatens to explode and disintegrate it in the coming months.

No fake warm loyalty words, no insincere unity expression, the empty friendship demonstrations on the coast of Mersey will not be able to hide this fact.

Angela Rayner (remember her?

The terrible survey degrees of the worker and the unlucky leader are struggling to rely on 20 percent of the votes, and Keir Starmer’s personal position in the tank shows that approximately 270 of the current crops of more than 400 deputies (including half of the cabinet) can come to the next election.

If they have the hope of saving Labour’s political skin, he took Starmer a rebellious conversation about his need to throw earlier, not later. Former Cabinet Minister (Under Gordon Brown) Now the Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham eagerly donated the mantos of the rebellious leader and the willing successor of Starmer.

His own style ‘northern king’ (Jacobite ‘King of Water’, considering his claims as a usurper), tried to undermine Starmer towards the conference. Even Michael Heseltine was never so clear when he was in maneuvers to dismiss Margaret Thatcher in 1990.

Burnham gave everyone printed and broadcast interviews (even Tora Telegraph) last week. Labour’s Weekly has a 6,000 -word profile on the cover of the Bible, the new statesman (the editor was given every access) and will be significantly displayed at the conference.

Labor Wags are already dubbing the ‘Andy Burnham Show’ Liverpool (since then). Starmer’s people are smoky.

Burnham accused PM for having a ‘transformative’ vision, calling the aspects of the welfare policy ‘absolutely disgusting’, and under Starmer, the Labor Party is faced with ‘existential threat’

No surprise. Burnham took every opportunity to tell the government how difficult it was. ‘Where is our plan to return the country?’ He asks without help, implying that Starmer is none, he presents a leftist plan on his own.

He blames the Prime Minister of having a ‘transformative’ vision, calls the aspects of the welfare policy ‘absolutely disgusting’, and under Starmer, the Labor Party is faced with ‘existential threat’. Unlike more cautious Hezza these years ago, there is nothing coded in Burnham’s criticism.

I have interviewed Burnham several times for years. I always found him smart, interesting, authentic. Unlike Starmer, he has a personality and people speak. For him there is more than just one politician. Its natural instincts are moderate center-left.

However, it has been ideologically mixed and politically opportunistic over the years. ‘A Blayite, Brownit and Corbynite are entering a Pub’, the joke is now recycling by Starmer Team. Barman asks: ‘What do you want to drink, Andy?’

Currently, there is no doubt where he stands: in the ambition of being a worker leader, he objected to the ‘soft’ left and more left from the party where the disappointment with Starmer is endemic.

As a result, he says something and policies that vary from space to outright dangerous.

“ We must go beyond being in Hock on bond markets, ‘he shouts. It’s hard to know what you mean. Left wing British politicians always enter the debt markets ‘Hock’ because they think that they can build socialism on the debtor money.

Probably because voters think that they will be less willing for their socialist plans, higher taxes have no more difficult but more honest way. Burnham wouldn’t be different. Indeed, it would be even worse than the current party.

Shortly before the £ 40 billion National Council Parliamentary Building program focused on Greater Manchester (naturally), which will be financed by more debt to bond markets, proposed.

I said Burnham was smart. But he didn’t think about it clearly. Even the smallest economy student, one year, can choose holes in it. But Burnham doesn’t end here. He ‘to roll back [Thatcherite] In the 1980s, he still proclaims in Kowtow, which is still open to labor that imagines such nonsense. Exactly why he will want to make this belief in this sane beggar.

England, which was under labor within the decade before Thatcher, was universally known as the ‘sick man of Europe’ and had to be rescued by this global lender, the last remedy, IMF.

However, Burnham, the French Royal House, said that he did not learn anything from the French Revolution, is like a Bourbon on the last day. He wants to revive all ‘basic services’ such as energy, water, bus, housing and railway (Starmer is already the last). The place where he will receive tens of billions to get these companies back is a mystery.

Partly implies that it can be covered by the shareholders ‘siphoned’ dividends. It is difficult to imagine a larger signal so that Labour Red: ‘Do not invest here’, except to build a big neon sign on Dover’s white rocks.

In fact, Burnham would still have to dive into the bond markets he was very much below. I calculate that Burnam Blueprint will roughly borrow £ 100 billion above £ £ 460 billion, and the Starmer government is expected to officially borrow it throughout the life of the current parliament. Too much to avoid ‘Hock’ to bond markets. Of course, the bond markets wouldn’t wear it. Investors who borrowed us murmurs about Burnham’s ‘financial naivety’, said that their plans will rapidly evacuate British bonds and increase the cost of serving the debt in the process.

We already borrow more than the other G7 big market economy, and this year, £ 110 billion debt service cost costs twice our defense expenditures.

Burnham plan is not a serious policy. The attempt to implement this will immediately provoke a financial crisis – almost definitely a stagnation because the interest rates increased and the investment collapsed.

That’s what Starmer’s people think. The gloves appeared in 10 Downing Streets, which are much more rough than the bond market investors about Burnham. A senior assistant to the Prime Minister is that Burnham ‘economically illiterate’, ‘cheap’ and ‘desperate; Another is ‘bad and irresponsible’; Even third, Blunter: ‘Most of the cabin just want it to be closed.’

The team now depicts him as ‘Labour’s Liz Truss’. Just as they scare the bond markets with tax deductions financed by more borrowing almost three years ago, Burnham claimed that they will send the economy to a tail point by lending the economy. On his way to Liverpool, he transforms Starmer Loyalists Burnham’s Whatsapp Mash into a cage.

It is controversial whether any of them will undermine their popularity of their loyalty to labor. As a result, labor conferences are foreigners who come economically as well as an alcoholic. The rank and file are drawing the Burnham plan.

But Starmer’s apparators are now playing hardball. The usurper will be more briefing about ‘economic ignorance’. The movements now deny Burnham’s nomination for labor with any choice.

Workers in the Manchester region was told to sit down to sit down, to open up for him. So at least for now, the king of the north can disappear yet.

However, this is still leaving a deeply impressive and increasingly popular Starmer responsible for a government -free and non -popular government. It is unlikely that the plan to use Liverpool for a major reset for a major reset will gain new purpose or acceleration (and the risk of shadow of Burnham’s Shenanigans).

Labour’s low -level civil war will continue. Starmer’s days will still appear number. And the worker will not renew Liverpool and will be renewed, but he will ask himself: If not Burnham, who?