Macron is right – Brexit is to blame for Britain’s immigration crisis
If there was something that symbolized what many of them still see as the fraudulent approach of Brexiteers during the EU referendum campaign, it was an infamous bus that promised an extra 350 million pounds per week for NHS.
But maybe Brexit critics should consider another image.
From the point of view of Emmanuel Macron, who was expressed at a joint press conference with Keir Starmer yesterday, the real Whopper was told in 2016 when Nigel Farage opened the controversial posters containing thousands of immigrants on the EU border with the slogan “Breaking Point”.
If the UK did not leave the EU, it came with the allegation that it would have to accept everyone who is preparing to stigma throughout Europe.
The French President, who refused to meet with Farage during a three -day state visit on Brexit, was clearly seen that he saw it as the greatest lie.
Macron, with obvious embarrassment of the Prime Minister standing next to him, did not withdraw his view that promised to control both legal and illegal migration and put an end to the out -of -control numbers, and was not used by those who wanted to leave the EU.
He said: “The British people sold a lie in which the problem was Europe. For the first time in nine years, England is pragmatic.”
However, it is worth looking at the details of what you say, not only how it cannot solve the problem, but also worse.
“Since Brexit – and I will say it honestly, because this is not your case, the Prime Minister – but many people in your country will help you fight Brexit better.
“However, since Brexit, England has no migration agreement with the EU. So for people who want to pass, there is no legal way, nor does there be a way to send people back after a transition.
The French President was not wrong.
The truth is that the Dublin Agreement also sterilized the chance of returning illegal immigrants to the secure countries where Britain traveled to England in the EU.
The Dublin agreement allowed countries to refer to the first safe country where the immigrants came to the first safe country, which was a little more problem for places like Italy, Spain and some of them Eastern Europe.
It was also interesting to claim that one third of Macron’s illegal immigrants in the EU’s Schengen Free Travel area aimed at Britain due to language, welfare benefits and ease of work that was not detected in the black economy.
Even in terms of legal migration, the UK has already seen a large increase from the high level after Brexit, despite the “back control” message of the referendum campaign.
Starmer, himself and the French President of the “groundbreaking” return agreements, while discussing, Farage’ın photographs of boats full of immigrants said the channel.
Since 2020, not by chance, but when Britain left the EU and the crisis of small boats begins.
Reform leader and others on the right will argue that the real problem is other aspects of international law, including the refugee convention, including the refugee convention, which gives immigrants to the European Convention on Human Rights and to stay in the UK due to family ties or other compelling reasons.
They want Brexit to continue as a process of withdrawing from this international agreement framework by Britain to help the UK to create an international order.
These would leave England more isolated on Thursday, as with the “Easy Answers of Populism” and Farage’s ally Donald Trump in the White House.
The legal framework contained a security valve, the UK was still part of the EU, but the 2016 lesson is that a part of a complex agreement network was solved, and more will be withdrawn.
Not surprisingly, Farage complained that Starmer’s pilot’s “One In, One” agreement betrayed Brexit and took Britain back to the EU’s clutch.
However, as a bored French President stated, in fact, the UK was to be pragmatic for the first time in nine years ”.
If migration was more than anything else, if the Brexit had the effects of Brexit at the end of Britain, and perhaps to participate in the block in the long run, it would have been a great irony given the nature of the 2016 debate.
The United Kingdom government is currently ashamed to address Macron’s scores, but the French President once again drew attention to the fact that the biggest decision of this country in the 21st century will rely on a texture of lies.
