Madras High Court attempts to find solution for rental dispute between Tambaram Police Commissionerate and its landlords

On Thursday, July 17, 2025, he wanted to find the possibility of allowing the commission to function in a reasonable manner in the rented facilities, in an effort to find a solution for a rental disagreement between the landlords of a hired property and the Tambaram Police Commission.

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh asked the lawyer General (AG) PS Raman to find a calculation grade by fixing La 6.33 Lakh as a monthly rent for 2022 and increasing the amount each year by 10%. Until July 21st, the parties were asked to apply for more orders in the written petition opened by the landlords who wanted to have empty.

Since January 2022, the landlords have approached the court claiming that they have given their rental property to the Commission since January 2022, on the basis of an assurance that M. Ravi’s first commissioner would pay 10.14 lakh rent per month. However, the Tamil Nadu government, based on a Ministry of Public Works (PWD) valuation, agreed to pay only 6.33 lakh per month.

Since the proposal was not unacceptable for them, the landlords insisted on directing the commission to evacuate their property. AG told the court that the petitions could not seek such a direction through a petition because the tenant is only a state organization. Authorized, all leasing disputes should only be expressed before the rent control courts, he said.

In addition, the landlords, on the one hand, they want to sell the major credit dues La 130 crore immediately, on the other hand, on the other hand, monthly ₹ Monthly ₹ 18 lakh rental to allow the commission to continue to continue hot and cold. Authorized, the landlords themselves at some point, albeit limited to 6.33 Lakh agreed to accept, he said.

AG also rejected the accusation of the police commission by putting unauthorized constructions of the landlords, which raped and raped the adjacent lands.

AG said that he horrified all his applications about the principles of the case, that the hosts are elderly businessmen, that a reasonable increase to be fixed by the court could be paid rent and that an alternative land was assigned to a commitment to emptying the property two years later, he said.

AG said that the orders to be passed in the current WRIT petition should not be taken as a precedent, because most state office works from rented facilities and that all these hosts should not submit written petitions in the future.