UK

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: If ever we needed an effective opposition to rout Labour, it’s now

Isn’t there a limit to the price that Britain had to pay for Keir Starmer’s Labor Party a year ago?

This becomes one of the worst governments of modern history.

Some despair and nasten could be predicted. The worker pointed out that more militant supporters plan a class war attack on loud special education.

Other plans were buried in the depths of small pressure. Or he was implied by the ministers’ election to carry out them.

For example, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that he was held by left -wing dogmas to everyone who paid attention to his writings.

Cambridge, who spent most of his career with the disaster policies of Maoist China and North Korea, claimed to revive the Cambridge Ekantrik Joan Robinson.

Then we discovered that he was inexperienced. Did Sir Keir Starmer noticed this, or was he surprised by his suspicious allegations he spent for working as an economist at the UK Bank?

Apparently, he decided to leave him in place to absorb the regiment and opposition of his policies as much as possible – if so is a cruel revenge.

Isn’t there a limit to the price that Britain had to pay for Keir Starmer’s Labor Party a year ago?

His next task will almost certainly prefer to allow him to be sentenced, as there will be a major hidden tax increase obtained by not raising the thresholds in the direction of inflation.

However, this will not protect him from the general civil war, which he started by allowing him to cut the winter fuel allowance and reduce prosperity payments.

Did he really grasp that the Great New Parliament party is deeply full of men and women who are determined to spend the money of others emotionally on a large scale? Maybe not.

Sir Keir’s own politics is even a mystery for him. The feeling of a man flowing between the uncertain principles and the desire to stay on duty is very strong.

For example, he now says that he deeply regretted Britain as a ‘foreign island’, which he received as a repercussion of Enoch Powell’s 1968 migration speech.

He claims that he has not read it properly before he delivered a ridiculous thing for a prime minister to say.

This withdrawal of its own scenarios should be the end of the attempt to recover the bacon by trying to copy the reform of England.

He also claims that he was sorry for a pessimistic speech about the economy before: ‘We were very determined to show how bad it was to forget what people want to wait for something.’

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that it was held by left -wing dogmas to everyone who paid attention to the summers.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that it was held by left -wing dogmas to everyone who paid attention to the summers.

But is there anything that they will expect with four of them except for an intensifying civil war between Sir Keir and traditionally leftist deputy deputy leftist Angela Rayner?

Sir Keir and Mrs. Rayner are like two rivals struggling with each other on the edge of a cliff. The danger is that they both come together and suffer the country.

As things stop, this failed and increasingly more and more divided government can be four years.

It is vital for those who are against their policies to be ready to change both the labor force and it, to stop the decay, to stop decaying, to stop decay and to reclaim as much as possible.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button