Israel-Iran War Assessment: How Tel Aviv Failed Its War Objectives; What It Really Achieved In Tehran | World News
Iran-Israel Conflict: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that Israel has brought together its military ambitions in Iran after the uninterrupted air strike that lasted eleven days. The targets specified? To “seduce” Iran’s nuclear program and to obtain the regime change. However, independent analysts say that both goals have not been fulfilled and that Israel’s aggressive tactics may have been the opposite.
The evidence shows that the critical fisil material was released from Fordow before the US Raid and that Iran may have secured the most sensitive nuclear assets. As a result, the central question – whether the nuclear infrastructure has been damaged – has not been solved because Tehran rejected access to external inspectors.
Meanwhile, the use of Israel’s use of bunker bombs, including large ammunition penettors provided by the United States, was the limit of aggressive capacity. While Iran’s nuclear facilities are damaged slightly, the full effect is uncertain, especially when there is no third -party verification.
Israel’s senior Islamic guard Corpse (IRGC) commanders, including the targeted assassinations brought unexpected results. These strikes led to a rare moment of national unity, rather than weakening internal support to the regime. Citizens in Iran walked to defend their governments from reformers to hardliners – they saw the attacks as an attack on the nation. Internal solidarity questiones Israel’s strategy of military weakening of Iran by interrupting leadership.
Israel’s claim to target the “regime symbols”, such as the prison and Irib publisher of the house, was also met with skepticism. The attack on Evin, which is famous for hosting political prisoners, broke their detained lives even more as the prisoners moved to unexplained places. The bombing of the state media organization added fuel to Iran’s propaganda machine and caused threats to retaliation against Israeli publishers.
It could not provide extensive support for the Israeli campaign on the world stage. US President Donald Trump avoided full military participation, although Iran allowed strikes to nuclear places. The call to stop Israel’s nuclear enrichment – even for peaceful purposes – was not accepted by global leaders who emphasized return to non -evacuated frames instead.
Today, Iran is once again seen as an international partner for trade and diplomacy, contrary to Israel’s efforts to isolate it.
When Israel returned to the soil, the passage of Iran’s missile retaliation was apparent. Despite the advanced defenses of Israel, the Iranian bullets violated the sky – landed throughout the country. Interceptors ran in a dangerous way, drowned with supply chains, and daily routines stopped. The deduction of commercial flights, public services and daily trade created an enormous coercion to the Israeli economy – once again doubt the concept of military superiority.
Although the damage is important in Iran – hundreds of losses and widespread destruction – did not overthrow the regime. Instead, Tehran worn the attack, allowed strategic expressions through controlled retaliation and continued a diplomatic stance. When the ceasefire is now in force, Iran has managed to present itself as flexible and challenged.
In the end, Israel declared victory, but the results remained deeply uncertain. Neither nuclear facilities nor political leadership seem to have been threatened to decisively. Instead, Israel has left behind a more challenging, more unified and perhaps more dangerous country.
