Ministers deny UK-France migrant returns deal leaves open human rights loophole
The government has tried to pour cold water on its proposals that Britain’s agreement with the immigrant return with France has left a gap that would allow the deportation of human rights claims.
The “one, an exit” agreement, which entered into force on Wednesday, will see immigrants who are not suitable for staying in the UK in exchange for receiving those who have connections in the UK.
However, the conditions of the Treaty, the UK via small boat, the immigrants, the agreement to return to France to return to the UK’s “an extraordinary claim of human rights,” he said that there should be a clause, said that the attempts to deport them to France may disappoint them, he said.
Critics argued that this could risk making false practices in order to disappoint the deportation process and cause delays.
But talk Sky News On Wednesday morning, Cabinet Minister Lisa Nandy claimed that this was not the case, instead of any human rights case in France, he said.
“The agreement we hit, together with us, will allow people to send back to France, the claims of human rights,” he said.
“These claims will be heard in France. So I know that the Conservative Party says it is a gap. Not like that and we are really sure.”
Shadow Interior Minister Chris Philp said that the agreement “offers an easy gap for lawyers ve and said,“ France will not give us any data about the people they send to our way… So we have no idea who they really are. ”
On Tuesday, the Border Minister Dame Angela Eagle, claiming that the article was included in the substance that it was included in the ‘clearly unfounded’ human rights claims to avoid being returned ”.
“And we will do full security checks for any applicants and reject everyone who is risky.”
The treaty also gives an effective veto to France and other EU member states, and says that Britain will pay all the expenses for the transfer of asylum seekers to France and France.
“France, the individual’s public policy, internal security, public health or Schengen states that any of the states will be a threat to international relations … France will reject the request for back,” he says.
When the agreement was announced by Sir Keir Starmer at a joint press conference with the French President Emmanuel Macron, the Prime Minister said that the human smugglers who brought them here was a “Atılım Moment” that will “turn the tables”.
This week, the Interior Minister Yette Cooper admitted that the agreement was not a “silver bullet ına to stop small boat crossings, but there was a step change since the immigrants would be sent back along the channel for the first time.
Speaking BBCHe said he believed that he could help the gangs of crime, and refused to put a number of how many people would return within the scope of the agreement.
“We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people have been detained, how many people have been returned, and it is right to be transparent around it.”
Speaking to journalists on Monday, Tora leader Kemi Badenoch said that the agreement would probably lead to a small number of immigrants to be replaced with France and “will not make any difference”.
When asked whether the conservatives would not accuse them for migration and asylum, he said to the journalists: “No, I don’t accept it, because all the practices of the workmanship are stamped and to say that they process rubber.”
France’s Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said that the agreement was “establishing an experimental mechanism with an open target”.
The Treaty was approved on Monday, that is, everyone who enters England on a small boat can be detained immediately and return to France by the British government – the Ministry of the Interior waits for the detention to begin within days.
The EU Commission, Germany and other member states also gave a green light to the agreement – broke the previous concerns that the block could oppose the agreement.
The government said that immigration sanctions have made room for immigrant lifting centers, and that it has an operational strategy ready to define and process unacceptable immigrant groups for the abolition of the Border Forces.
The Ministry of the Interior also said that Tories took lessons from long legal challenges that prevent the unsuccessful Rwanda plan, and that “it is ready to defend any legal difficulties for the abolition of the first trial phase”.
Emek promised to destroy the number of people coming to England on small boats at the center of the government plan.
However, with a high record of records and still over 75,000 asylum accumulation, there is pressure for ministers to take harder action – the reform is even worsened by British success in surveys.
Last week, the figures showed that the number of immigrants who came to England after the British channel exceeded 25,000 – the oldest point in a calendar year in which 25,000 signs have passed since the first report on channel transitions in 2018.
A series of people arrested after a protest in Canary Wharf in London on Sunday, in the midst of protests against the use of hotels in the UK, hosting asylum seekers.
The Ministry of Interior refrained from commenting.
