MoD data breach that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk as superinjunction lifted
.png?width=1200&height=800&crop=1200:800&w=780&resize=780,470&ssl=1 "MoD data breach that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk as superinjunction lifted")
In February 2022, leakage revealed the details of thousands of Afghan, who said that they were in danger from the Taliban because of their connections to the UK forces and that they now want to escape to England.
Glunder triggered the Rubific Operation Operation, which includes the introduction of 16,000 Afghan as a part of England. The largest hidden peacock time evacuation, about 8,000 will still come.
All operations were kept secret from the MPs and the people, and the ministers decided to hide the real cause of evacuation from the parliament.
Learn more about the extraordinary violation of the government and how it was kept secret here:
The extraordinary case may only arise after a court war of national media for almost two years – Independent – A court order that is forbidden to talk about its existence for the abolition of Superinjunction.
The abolition of Superinjunction on Tuesday called for more investigations after an official examination of the data leakage of the Supreme Court Judge Justice Judge Justice Chamberlain, Superinjonction, “basically weakened the evidence foundation” on the data leak.
Catastrophic violation may occur as it is finally explained to the public:
- The government was ready to evacuate more than 42,000 people affected by data leakage at a cost of £ 7 billion
- It is believed that at least 17 people in the data set were killed by the Taliban, 14 of them after leakage occurred
- The official examination of the leak appointed in January 2025 warned that the government may have made it more attractive to the Taliban by creating a special evacuation plan and slapping the media with a super junk.
- Mode faces more than 650 Afghan claims to compensate for compensation, which can cost hundreds of millions of pounds
After the abolition of Superinjunction, Defense Minister John Healey presented a “sincere apology on behalf of the British government for data violation. Addressing the deputies, he added that he was deeply concerned about the lack of transparency ”.
Nevertheless, hours before the abolition of Superinjunction, journalists were shot with a new precautionary precautionary measure that prevented the exact details of the electronic table and argued that the government should be implemented for privacy and national security reasons.
The extremely secret database contained information on the re -settlement scheme of MOD, and to re -place Afghans working with the British forces established after the disaster from Kabul.
Approximately 18,714 applicants and family members were selected in the database shared by a member of an armed forces trying to verify the cases. Mr. Healey said the soldier believes that the list contains only 150 names, but admitted the leak “never should be”.
The majority of these applicants were not already suitable for moving to the UK, and most of them were still in Afghanistan.
The list also included the names of the British government officials.
An independent case employee, who expressed his concerns on the mode leakage, described the leak as a “bone creepy ve and warned the authorities that the document was the“ killing list of the vulnerable Afghans.
After the violation was discovered by Mode in August 2023, the Supreme Court fulfilled a Superinjunction, which means that the violation could not be reported. According to Judge Justice Chamberlain, “Contra Mundum was given, that is, it was believed to be the first order of the species.
This means that the government has not encountered any examination or subsequent operations on violations or subsequent operations since orders.
In total, 23,900 Afghan, which was connected to violations, were offered to UK and already in the UK more than 16,000. Mod says that 6,900 of them are otherwise people who will not be brought to England.
To explain the need for a new re -settlement scheme without warning Taliban to leak, Mr. Healey In a written statement to the MPs, the changes will “provide more efficiency,” he said. Authorities, the plan “supply” to thousands of people who came to the United Kingdom, and the Councils to explain why Afghan families should be in their regions, he said.
In January 2025, the former Deputy Director of Defense Intelligence Paul Rimmer reviewed the government’s approach, led to a report that would make holes in legal cases and ultimately lead to the abolition of Superinjunction.
In order to define the objectives of the Taliban, he will conclude that he has already reached the “significant amount of data volume” and that the leaked data set will be “part of the puzzle instead of a cigarette gun”.
He also found that Superinjunction’s data set may have made things worse, making the Taliban look more attractive than it was actually than in fact.
The report will advise the Defense Secretary to abolish the precautionary measure and to question the judiciary to question the defense intelligence assessments that have so far supported the case of mode.
On Tuesday, Justice Chamberlain, who has heard this case for more than 18 months, rejected Superinjunction and read his summary decision.
Saying that the giving of a Superinjunction leads to serious free speech concerns, Superinjunction said that “a completely closing effect of accountability mechanisms operating in a democracy”.
After taking precautionary measures, in an urgent statement to the Commons, Mr. Healey said that he felt “uncomfortable ve with Superinjunction and“ in some angles, he said.
He said: “No government does not want to store information from the British people, parliamentarians or the press,” he said.
However, when he apologized to the last Torah government, he admitted that “difficult decisions should be taken”.
The deputies at the Effective Defense Election Committee will now investigate the incident, President Tanmanjeet Singh said MP MP is a “mess” that must be examined extensively due to “serious consequences”.
Campaigns and politicians also asked questions about how the leak took place and how the government reacts.
Mr. Healey’s statement in the intervention in Parliament, Tor Deputy Mark Pritchard, for two years, the incident did not provide any examination of the measure detonated. He warned that a Superinjunction argument, even because it is too thin because it is too thin, the mode admits that the Taliban has already accessed the database of aligned individuals, ”he warned.
Former Tor leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith added: um I’m worried that the supervision of the supervision was strange, he stopped any free conversation or exam in the parliament, and we are still not smarter for who he was responsible or causing. ”
“These Afghans protected us and deserved us to protect in return.”
The Information Commissioner Office, England’s data guard dog, added that the violation “at risk thousands of vulnerable people” and “never happens again”, but he added that there is no other regulatory action right now ”.
Former Defense Secretary Ben Wallace, who served during the data violation, refused to comment by stating that the super -cautious measure came after leaving the mode.
A source close to his successor Grant Shapps said that the data violation took place before taking office and that his job was to olmak solve confusion and save lives ”.
