OpenAI ‘productivity’ scam is self-interested garbage

One of the permanent features of the “efficiency debate ındaki in Australia is to force its own interests hidden as a benefit to the economy through increasing productivity. Crirase Readers know everything about this – the company’s tax reductions demands, the cutting of the “bureaucracy”, the forcing of the protection for workers.

This week “reportFrom Openai, who was launched by visiting Openai’s Economic Plan “and launched by visiting Ronnie Chief Economist” Ronnie Chatterji, we have seen it directly from the business lobbyists in Australia. The only surprise is that he does not see that he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as he lives, as one of the real reports of the business council. Potential ”.

As an amnesiac media, every recycled business is in the form of a kind of amazing new insight, as the chattergia and TOME – 15 (census) dates back to generous intermittent pages – it took a warm welcome from the media. . Financial review Detailed “Why does Openai’s best economist get a chatgpt to check his meals?“In an interview with chattergia, gathering at the Parliamentary House meeting with the Labor Party luminaires,” The increase in Australia by touching a button of 115 billion dollars per year, ” concrete Nine newspapers. This “increase” is currently about 4.4% of GDP – a great claim for a desperate country to increase productivity.

Mark di Stefano only in the rear window column He was ready to say nonsense (And Chatterji draws attention to the labor force connections that help the ministry meetings that many small and medium -sized Australian businesses can only imagine or pay a lot of money to a lobby.

As always, Openai’s economic benefits came with a demand: Australia to obtain alleged 115 billion dollars of benefits, AU’s adopting AI, embracing AI in the government and accessing government data, taxpayer’s money, such as tax centers, such as data centers, such as “data centers”. [sic] – Did they use artificial intelligence to write the report?

In other words, it is the demand for great government expenditures for the benefit of AI companies and the demand of citizens to deliver their personal information to a gigantic, confidentiality scale.

When it comes to $ 115 billion a year, where did this come from? This 2023 Report By Microsoft and Technical Council – This reliability horoscope – This claimed that productive artificial intelligence predicted the labor productivity benefits. On 38 pages, this report is a positive Proustian compared to the brochure of Chattergia. However, 115 billion dollars, the most optimistic situation offered-for the “slow-paced adoption” only 45 billion dollars, for medium-paced adoption of $ 75 billion and 115 billion dollars-for the end of the five-fifth-five good situation.

And even these figures are the result of some assumptions: how many working hours have the potential to automate or increase automatically by GAI ??

“Then, we estimate the number of hours that are likely to pass to other tasks successfully… We calculate the efficiency and quality gains of this successful transition. Every hour automated by GAI and other tasks can increase workers per worker.” Report readings.

Therefore, instead of a reasonable estimation of productivity benefits from AI, we assume that $ 115 billion is realized and assumes that X is in the best possible way ”.

For a reliable view of the potential efficiency advantages of artificial intelligence, we should turn to an independent organ, not a package seeking interest that is interested. One OECD Working Certificate A year ago, he looked at the refereed literature around AI productivity and found a very different story. Although there are more productivity (and more workers’ satisfaction) in industries where productive AI is in use, the claims of great productivity gains seem to be overly cooked. Goldman Sachs found that the widespread adoption of productive artificial intelligence in the US would increase the increase in labor productivity from 1% to 1.5% per year. Other estimates were still more pedestrians: ıcı The increase in cumulative productivity of less than 1% for 10 years ”.

One of the reasons for this has shown that the automation history in the last few hundred years has pushed the increasing efficiency, demands and resources to other, less productive sectors of the economy as a result of automatic technology. As explained by the OECD article: “In fact, the increase in productivity in AI-MARRUZ activities will be balanced to activities with a slower increase in productivity (for example, potentially less knowledge-intensive, personal services).

The OECD team warned that “potentially more than other digital technologies, the features of AI systems that may lead to the advantage of early carrier and market concentration, overturning and sovereignty, can prevent competition and competitiveness in providing artificial intelligence services – to develop the effects of large technology representatives. The report also warns AI companies about agreement and market breakdown.

This is the key to the Feting of the Open AI’s report and its spruiker’s media and politicians: the same search and influence that we have seen very often than the country’s largest companies for decades.

The innovation and efficiency of the large companies in Australia – companies that are willing to increase their market shares at the expense of competitors, benefit from the benefits of officials and increase margins at the expense of customers, try to influence the policy makers and to disrupt the regulatory “market” in favor of the rivals. The real competition in many Australian markets wins the competition from the government to secure regulatory and taxation, not the kind that customers and other enterprises use.

Openai’s effort can dress in the stylish outfit of digital services, but the shit looking for the same rent below.