National Guard troops will stay under Trump’s control, for now, under 9th Circuit order

Late at night on Thursday, the US 9th Court of Appeal Court, President Trump’s thousands of California national guard troops in Los Angeles Gov. Gavin paused a court order that would require him to return it to news.

9. The emergency stay of the circuit came after hours US Regional Judge Charles Breyer San Francisco decided that when Trump mobilized thousands of guards members due to protests on immigrant raids, and when he had to return the troops to state control on Friday, he had broken the law.

In the 9th period, three referee panels appointed by two judges and President Biden appointed by Trump planned a hearing on Tuesday, that is, the national guards will become federal during the weekend.

In a 36-page decision of a US Regional Court, Breyer wrote that Trump’s actions were “illegal ilgışıl illegal-and violated the 10th change in the US Constitution”. Breyer added that the Trump administration claimed that “a protest against the federal government, a fundamental civilian freedom protected by the first amendment, could justify a finding of a rebellion”.

Having opened the case with the province of California, Newsom described power as a gaz gains for all Americans ”.

“Today was really about the democracy test and we passed the test today,” he said.

Decision, California Atty. General Rob Bond, told reporters, “After quickly reviewing the realities of our case, the court saw the principle of our argument,” he said.

“We are not in the throat of a rebellion,” Bonda said. “We are not under the threat of an invasion. Nothing prevents the federal government’s application of federal laws. Last weekend, the situation in Los Angeles did not guarantee the deployment of military units and their arrival only inflamed.”

The Trump administration notified the case late on Thursday.

During the hearing with Breyer, the judge seemed to be skeptical for the President’s claim that the courts could not question the Key legal issues, including whether the courts, the protests and unrest in Los Angeles constitute “a danger of rebellion or rebellion.

“We are talking about the use of the president’s authority, and of course it is limited to the authority of the president,” Breyer said. “This is the difference between President and King George.”

Trump and the White House argued that it was legal in accordance with the 12406th of the military mobilization. Title 10 If the US has a danger of rebellion or rebellion against the authority of the US government ,, the armed forces code that gives the President the authority to federalize the national guards.

Breyer wrote Breyer, “protests in Los Angeles are very inadequate than rebellion,” Breyer wrote. He said that there were examples of violence, but the Trump administration did not define a ün a violent, armed, organized, open and hunted uprising ”as a whole”.

“Evidence that protesters gathered to protest a single issue is very big.” Breyer said.

Title 10 also requires that the orders coming from the President to be published through the state governors.

As the governor, Newsom is the chief commander of the National Guards of California. Last Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sent a note to the president of the California guards to mobilize about 2,000 members and then sent the note to the office of Newsom. The case said neither Newsom nor his office did not consent to mobilization.

Newsom wrote to Hegseth on Sunday and asked him to cancel his deployment of unity. In the letter, the mobilization, “a serious violation of state sovereignty that seems to be deliberately designed to exacerbate the situation, and at the same time the state to place these staff and resources really needed,” he said.

Breyer asked, “If you didn’t actually send him, I’m trying to figure out what someone is’ ”, Breyer asked. “Does it go as long as he gets a copy at some point?”

However, Breyer was less eager for the legality of Trump’s deployment of US Maritime to Los Angeles. California lawyers, 140 Marine Infantry in the next 24 hours to relax and change the guards said.

In response to a series of flash raids of migration and customs enforcement agents in the district, protests appeared in Los Angeles on Friday. A handful of agitators among the protesters committed violence and vandalism and asked Trump to quickly respond to the California national guards. On Monday, sailors actively in charge of the operation. Protests and some sporadic violent rebellion have continued since the deployment.

Trump said that mobilization is necessary to “cope with violent, provoked rebellions ve and that“ Los Angeles will be completely destroyed without the national guard.

Breyer said that the Trump administration has determined “some stray violence incidents on protests ve and from there that“ state and local authorities could not be under the rebellion ”.

Breyer wrote, “the federal government in our constitutional system is not satisfied with how strongly or rapidly the state has applied its own laws,” he wrote.

General lawyers from the other 18 states and Los Angeles City Atty. Hydee Feldstein-Stooto supported California’s position in the case.

Wilner reported from Washington, Wong Francisco from DC and Nelson from Los Angeles.