Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he’s at war with his own MPs

Sir Keir Starmer looked chipper as he rides a plane from the NATO Summit on Wednesday evening. He thanked Hague for Hague, a two -day trip to Hague, travel press delegation. And when we just looked at NATO, it was a successful.

Throughout the Board of Directors, allies, GDP up to 5 percent of defense expenditures registered in a historical increase. After briefly hesitating his loyalty to Article 5, Donald Trump even lined up.

And frustratingly, after a public love with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the NATO Secretary -General Mark Rutte, who was called “Father ında between Iran and Israel’s two fighter countries, admitted that the alliance was no longer a“ dismantling ”, saying that its European friends were now“ all the way ”.

In the meantime, Starmer was able to easily and by increasing the nuclear capabilities of England by acquiring a comfortable and 12 new F-35A fighter aircraft to Mr. Trump and threw England as a leader on the world stage.

But when the Prime Minister briefly greeted the media that shared the plane with him, what was said was his return to the most important rebellion of his premiere – a rebellion that threatened to shake the foundations of the historical majority he won just 11 months ago.

Speaking at a press conference about his contribution to defense expenditures just a few hours ago at the NATO Summit, the Prime Minister had to reject suggestions that he could get out of office before the next election.

“Before the election, many people predicted that we could not read the room, we did not take politics right ” We will not win an election after 2019 ‘because we lost very badly.

Sir Keir, “There is a landslide victory. So I am comfortable to read the room and to offer the change in the country,” he insisted.

But at home, the deputies were much less convinced.

More than 120 workers’ deputies signed a change that would kill the government’s flagship completely to kill welfare reforms of £ 5 billion. And there is an increasing feeling that the prime minister cannot listen to them after using a part of the NATO pressure to reject the rebellion as “sounds”.

In the amendment, a Labor Party deputy, “MPs do not see as irritating and feed,” he said. “We all work hard and treat us like this. It extends to the point how arrogant and out of contact they are.”

The Prime Minister’s comments at the NATO press conference showed a real lack of empathy for his own deputies and a significant failure to read the room in an ironic way.

It would be difficult to claim that the Prime Minister was a completely non -completely person. Prime Minister’s deep profile New statesman He showed how deep the weight of the victims of individuals who put their lives in order to serve the countries of the individuals published at the beginning of this month.

However, in his first year, it became increasingly clear that the Prime Minister was much more comfortable than visiting foreign diplomacy and was much more comfortable than dealing with angry backbenchers.

In this area, Sir Keir seems to be completely empathy. It is known to be pragmatic instead of ideological and seems to be bored by political maneuver.

Sometimes, the Westminster can take a refreshing break from the balloon. However, when taken too much, it can be the opposite.

Starmer seems to have overlooked the fact that political maneuver is more than a self -serving stance in some scenarios. Sometimes a struggle for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are afraid of losing vital financial support.

The Prime Minister is now gathering wildly with leading deputies who participated in the changes made to guarantee their support by making concessions. However, the fact that it was allowed to go so far, naturally angry those who tend to support the Prime Minister. Many of them now threaten to dig their heels until the bill dies in water.

As Starmer returns from a strong show in NATO, he must now exhibit a part of his empathy and political nous, which he shows so effectively on the global stage. If he cannot do this, he may lose the civil war well – and may be a disaster for his authority.