google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

‘A bully’s tool’: Readers slam new home secretary’s ‘desperate’ immigration rhetoric

Independent Readers suspect that Shabana Mahmood promises to suspend visas for countries that refuse to reclaim unsuccessful asylum seekers, and many people warn the risk of giving policy risks further back and damaging their goals.

Many, small boat arrival is a part of the general migration and legal visas are directing the higher numbers, he said.

Many emphasized the contradiction of targeting countries such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, which supplies Basic NHS personnel, and said that restrictions would damage the UK more than source countries.

Others said that visa sanctions can put pressure on smaller, assistant nations, but rarely to work against the big powers, which can retaliate or ignore such threats.

In addition, there was more general anger in Emek, critics accused the party of accusing of reform.

A minority supported Mahmood’s harsh discourse, but many rejected policy as a punishment that would harm the economy of the UK and the maintenance system.

Some readers called for more measures, including forcing foreign governments to pay the cost of appeal, prosperity and return, or forcing immigrants abroad until they were deported.

Here is what you have to say:

Small boat passage will not change numbers

WHY it was a visual signal that that something is actulyly Workers, Many of Whom Remain After Their Visas Expire, OR FALSELY APPLY FOR ASYLUM HERE, WHYE ONL A FEW GENUINE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM CAN APPLY FOR A VISA FROM OVERSEAS – CREATING

It is difficult to see how more visa restrictions on countries do to deterd illegal immigrants, but they rely on further education providers and businesses. Why does the worker insist on why the same things will make a difference … changing?

Topsham1

Are Visa bans logical or “completely strange” as some readers claim? Join the Discussion Comments.

Self -punishment

Most of the same countries marked to prevent or delay the deportation of illegal immigrants are important sources of legal immigrants, especially in the UK health sector.

India is the largest NHS doctor without UK. Bangladesh and Pakistan also contribute to both doctoral and nurses. Nepal is an important supplier of care workers in both NHS and private care homes.

Therefore, the UK reliable these countries to fill their basic NHS and maintenance work, while their visas are among the worst when it comes to cooperation on the returns of their citizens whose asylum claims are rejected or guilty.

The Minister of the Interior, such as a Visa Visa visa, can be restricted or suspended for countries that do not take back their citizens after the abolition orders.

Britain is actually a self -punished punishment that threatens to suspend visas for doctors, nurses or care workers from countries such as India or Bangladesh. These countries do not need to take what the UK is deported, but the UK needs talented workers to ensure that the NHS and the care sector work.

Thus, the logic is nonsense: iz If you do not take back your exaggeration, we will stop hiring your nurses. ” This does not harm the source country much, it hurts UK hospitals and care houses. Britain is a weak threat unless it is often willing to take this economic and social hit.

The US and the EU have tried similar leverages, such as visa restrictions – but the other party rarely works when the labor force supply. In this case, the UK says effectively, yap Do what we want or we will block people we needlessly ,, which makes it desperate and strategically inconsistent.

Emilonte

Countries should take full responsibility

It’s a start, but it’s not going almost enough. Countries need to be forced to take full legal responsibility for their citizens when they reach a country illegally. If an Indian United Kingdom comes illegally or excessively loaded, the Indian government must take responsibility by regulating and paying their return to India. If there are illegal objections, the Indian government should finance this appeal, housing and welfare costs until this appeal is completed. If an illegal crime commits a crime in England, it should be imprisoned in its own country.

It is completely strange that the host nation pays these costs. If an illegal citizenship refuses to provide proof of citizenship, he must be imprisoned until then.

Saghia

We are obsessed with Trivia

Until June 2025, we came with small boats looking for 43,000 asylum seekers.

There will be more than half to have good claims on the investigation and will be allowed to stay. The rest will be deported (and if we improve the processing of demands, they will be deported faster as necessary).

In 2024, Germany, the EU countries (250.550) applied the highest number of asylum, Spain (166.145), Italy (158.605) and France (157.460).

In contrast, 948.000 legal The immigrants came to England in 2024.

We’re all obsessed with Trivia.

Stevehill

A bullying tool

Visa sanctions are the best sanctions against the limited leverage of their leverages, depending on help, and poorer states.

Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, Sierra Leone or Gambia, such as countries such as Gambia largely rely on foreign currencies and international honor, so when the UK squeezes visa access to the elites and ordinary families. This increases the surrender of governments.

But it is a different story against the bigger or strategically important countries – India, China, Nigeria, Türkiye – this is a different story.

They can retreat, retaliate on their own restrictions, or ignore the pressure.

The United States has tried to threaten India with chapter 243 (D) sanctions on deportation problems, but the new Delhi never really bend because the United States values ​​too much to rise to the relationship.

So yes, in narrow situations, it can “work”, but this is not a universal rod. Rather, a bullying is like a tool for weaker situations, not a serious arm against the great powers.

Mollilie

Nothing will change when under the ECHR

It’s a great rhetoric, but can he do something really important? I’m not afraid. In order to send people back, he must overcome the obstacles to be created by the industrial brotherhood of leftists and immigration lawyers in his party.

Nothing will change until the ECtHR has the power over England. Cooper is gone, he’il replace him. They can clean the entire department, nothing changes.

I remember how Jacqueline Smith, who is currently in the cabinet, uses the bold men fighting for this country. None of today’s leftist bleeding hearts came to the aid of these brave veterans. Gordon Brown’s government, including Jacqui Smith to get justice for Gurkhas, had to be an actress Joanna Lumley to stand up and fight. Labor is ready to be on the wrong side of the fence and history. They did not change – they will listen to the leftist core and they will not do anything on the boats, because as a party, they are not for the rights of the fair.

Krispad

Starmer has no belief

Starmer is not a politician. He has no idea, belief or policy on his own, so he has to try to look at who looks popular in the hope that he can help with gloomy popular statistics. Therefore, he told the MPs to reform UK LTD to copy everything they did, to sing from the same divine page, so that he could have the chance to win any other election other than his boss Netanyahu and the Jewish lobby that brought him to power in the first place.

By calling reform, he will see that he has lost millions of good voters and helps reform to win the next election, in which case the dog helps all of us.

Fenwoman

Sending refugees back to the persecution

In other words, our solution is to give them back to the persecution because they see persecution in their own countries for those looking for asylum. ~ Well done lady Mahmood.

Why are so many immigrant children entering politics to do their best to make anyone follow them to this heavy island?

Bar7

More, Miracle

It is difficult to believe that we continue to give a visa in countries that refuse to take back their own citizens!

For the last 25 years, the real immigration policy of the government is simply: more, more.

Ian Robinson

To make threats like empire

Is it about Trump? Are you threatening to other countries as if there is still an empire? This is not about illegal migration, but both of them are related to asylum seekers and refugees protected by international law.

Ladycrumssall

A solution to the boat problem

There is no such thing as the right panthering. The so -called “boat problem” can be easily solved by allowing refugees to be made before refugees arrived in England. Performing them only in the UK forces refugees to find a way for England.

AATHEORJİN

We will be suffering

If visa arrangements are cut with countries that do not enter the refugee refund plan, who suffers? We do it. This means that we will not only refuse to take refuge in those who flee from war and persecution, but we will not give a visa to the workers we need desperately.

Lils

Some comments are arranged for shortness and clarity for this article.

I want to share Your views? Just save your information below. Once you have registered, you can comment on the best stories of the day for a chance to stand out. Alternatively, click ‘login’ or ‘registration in the upper right corner to log in or sign.

Make sure you follow us Community Directiveswhich can be found Here. For a complete guide about how to comment Click here.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button