google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

News organizations barred from White House by Trump ask federal court to block ban until case is resolved – US politics live | US news

News organizations ask court to bar White House enforcement of access ban until case is resolved

Three news outlets that Donald Trump banned from White House have asked a federal court to extend his block until the case is resolved.

The media organizations say the administration has “persisted in unpredictably and inconsistently implementing its ban” despite a judge’s restraining order – including selectively barring CNN from White House pool duties.

“The White House’s words and actions leave little doubt that it will immediately reinstitute a complete ban of CNN, MS Now, and POLITICO if allowed the opportunity,” lawyers for CNN, MS Now and Politico wrote in a filing late on Monday.

“Because the ban is an unlawful assault on the most fundamental First Amendment freedoms and will inflict irreparable harm on Plaintiffs and the public if not restrained, this Court should preliminarily enjoin its enforcement pending the resolution of this case,” the filing said.

A two-week temporary restraining order on Trump’s ban of the three organizations, issued by US district judge Timothy Kelly last week, restored the outlets’ White House access, but expires on 8 October.

The preliminary injunction requested in Monday’s filing would extend the White House access until the case is finally resolved.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

For some context, it’s worth remembering that Smith had a two-volume report of his findings as a result of his criminal investigations – that resulted in two indictments against the president after his first term. The first focused on Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, while the second on the president’s retention of classified documents.

However, in February, a Trump-appointed federal judge permanently barred the justice department from released the second volume of Smith’s report.

Aileen Cannon condemned Smith for what she called a “brazen stratagem” of compiling a report even after she had dismissed the case on grounds that he was unlawfully appointed to his role.

Share

Updated at 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button