Newsom vs. Trump judge orders L.A. troop deployment records handed over

The Trump administration should take over the cache of a document, photographs, internal reports and other evidence that detares the activities of the army in Southern California, and reigned on Tuesday, and gave a procedural victory to the state in the struggle for thousands of military reliefs under the command of the President.
Charles R. Breyer, a senior regional judge of the federal court in San Francisco, allowed California lawyers to dismiss key management officials and reported that the troops could review the questions about how long they were under federal control.
The Ministry of Justice opposed the movement, saying that there is no opportunity to respond ”.
The decision watched a loss of pain for the state on Thursday, when a appeal panel had ordered Breyer’s control of the troops to the leaders of California to the leaders of California.
Judge Mark R. Bennett of Honolulu, written for the court, said that the judiciary should extensively postpone the president to decide whether a “rebellion, and that civilians protesting immigration representatives were sufficiently prevented from being deported from the national guard or maritime.
Bennett wrote that the President had the authority to take action under a charter that olmadan when the President cannot do with regular forces to carry out the US laws to carry out the laws of the US ”.
However, no court has yet to deal with California’s other major claims: by assisting the immigrant raids under Trump’s command, the 1878 Posse Comitatus Law, which prohibited the application of civil laws of soldiers.
The Legal Director of Northern California Aclu, Shilpi Agarwal, defended the White House abuse the Post-War Law, known as PCA in Jargon, and supported the migration and customs implementation operations of the soldiers.
“There is no dispute that the national guards are currently banned by the PCA – he said legally must be, Agar said Agarwal. “Going to the community with ice officers and playing a role in individual ice raids really sounds as designed to ban the Posse Comitatus Law.”
In the June 12 decision, Breyer wrote that such a claim was “early ve and said that there was not enough evidence to weigh whether this law was broken.
9. The circuit accepted.
“Although the President of the President has the authority to federalize the national guards, nothing in our decision does not address the quality of the activities in which federalized national guards can interact,” Bennett wrote. “Before the regional court, the plaintiffs argued that some use of the National Guards would violate the Posse Comitatus Law. … We do not express any opinion on this issue.
Now, California, forcing the government from the government and the Ice Field Office Director Ernesto Santacruz, Jr. and the Major Niave F. Knell, who chaired the operations for the army department responsible for Hom Homeland Defense ,, has permission to transfer figures such as F. Knell.
Agarwal, except for a few exceptions, said that such evidence would be open to the public immediately, another victory for California.
“In this case, as the facts are further developed, I think that the less way to call the national guards will reveal more clearly to everyone,” he said.
On Monday, at the briefing, the Trump administration argued that the troops “only perform a protective function”.
The movement of the Ministry of Justice, “Nothing in the preliminary precautionary measure record, the guards and Marine Posts used to carry out the federal laws and the efforts of protecting property, rather than the execution of federal laws does not support the claim that it is reasonable,” he said.
The Federal government also claimed that even if the troops implement the law, he would not violate the Posse Comitatus Law – and claimed that if it were, the northern part of California would have a limited authority.
“Considering the finding of the ninth circuit, the National Guards ‘National Guards’ can call the US laws with regular forces ‘, but when federalized, when federalized,'[ing] Laws, ” he said.
The next few weeks will be very important for Agarwal and other civilian freedom experts.
“Based on Vandalism and people who throw something into cars, there is this atmospheric Rubicon, which can be a reason for the circulation of our streets,” he said. “There was more unrest when the Lakers won the championship.”