NY Times’ Hannah-Jones criticizes ‘unsettling’ efforts to honor Charlie Kirk

New York Times correspondent and 1619 project writer Nikole Hannah-Jones called the public figures to mourn and respect Charlie Kirk after an experiment Sunday assassination.

After Kirk assassinated a turning point on a Utah campus at the beginning of this month, at the US event, Hannah-Jones defendant Some democrats and political centrists “sort” to honor someone with “extremist” views.

“[I]Following the death of Kirk, individuals and institutions around the country took action not only to kill and condemn political violence, but also to respect him. Hannah-Jones was uncomfortable to see the respect of politicians from the political spectrum about a man who adopted a racist great spare theory that argues that white Americans were systematically replaced by systematic multiculturalism and brown and black immigrants.

NY Times claims that Charlie Kirk has made antisemitic explanation in the story of political views

Kirk added that “black people commit more crimes than white people” and Islam is not “compatible with Western civilization”.

Hannah-Jones also rejected the efforts to celebrate Kirk as the Free Speech Champion and claimed that they would lead to the mainstream of “former pro-excessive views”.

Hannah-Jones, “The Trump administration feels both frightening and dangerous, as the common social values ​​of the common social values ​​of civil rights in a century and the common social values ​​of multiculturalism and tolerance to excuse the re-emergence of the ruthless bigotry in the mainstream policies.

Professor, Charlie Kirk’a ‘Nazi’ won the legal, a ‘Nazi’ who increases the Free Speech Debate “

Nikole Hannah-Jones accused Charlie Kirk of pushing the “extremist” views. (Getty Images)

He argued that Kirk’s willingness to argue with political opponents peacefully and to keep discourse with political opponents was looking at the people of the “black and transsexual community” directly targeted by the activist’s discourse.

“The President of the United States of the United States argues that after the efforts of diversity and at a time when he uses his power to participate in the mass deportation project, some advanced people have to find a way to find a common ground with the followers of podcasts and discussions of people, immigrants and other marginal groups coming from humanity by Kirk’s interpretation.”

The NY Times columnist believes that Charlie Kirk applied politics ‘correct’ after the liberal reaction

Nikole Hannah-Jones warned Charlie Kirk that the defense would normalize harmful discourses against the black and transgender community. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)

Fox News has reached Turning Point USA for Digital Comment.

Click here to get the Fox News app

A few democratic politicians and media commentators similarly criticized Kirk’s discourse after his death. Fifty-eight parliamentary democrats say that the heritage belongs to the “garbage box of history”.