Love economics collides with attraction technology
When romantics hear the word love, they may think ‘at first sight’, ‘it’s blind’ or ‘it conquers all’.
But research economists will probably turn to the less poetic “classifier matching.”
This phrase describes the long-observed tendency to associate with others with similar educational and socio-economic backgrounds, often after meeting through school, university, work, or overlapping social circles.
For decades, this classification has quietly shaped the structure of Australian households.
The e61 Institute’s analysis shows that 38 percent of working-age couples now both have a college degree.
Graduates are approximately 85 percent more likely to partner with another graduate.
But as the trend has taken hold for good, online dating has drastically changed the way people meet.
Swiping culture has expanded the dating pool beyond lecture halls and office corridors.
Researchers are waiting to determine whether dating apps are reinforcing assortative mating or starting to undo it.
The diverse mating pattern that has evolved over half a century has fundamentally changed the makeup of Australian couples, according to research economist Elyse Dwyer.
Ms Dwyer said the research pointed to a shift over the past 50 years reflecting the increasing participation of women in higher education and business, but the data showed only who was mating, not how or why they were mating.
“We can make guesses about what kind of partnership they form.
“But to what extent this disclosure mechanism holds up against this active search… I’m not quite sure.”
This ambiguity is important in the age of Tinder.
If assortative mating stems in part from proximity and shared institutions, dating apps have dissolved those boundaries.
A teacher in Parramatta can be matched with a tradesperson in Penrith or a counselor in Potts Point without ever sharing a workplace or campus.
User-reported priorities don’t sound particularly economical either.
Tinder’s Year of the Swipe 2025 report says it sees “a shift away from career level or finances-related boxes towards chemistry, shared values, authenticity and emotional availability.”
“Kindness also remains an important indicator of attractiveness.”
While 37 percent of single young people say that common values are necessary in dating, 64 percent say that what is needed most in dating is emotional honesty.
More than half say being rude to staff is their biggest “peer”.
On the surface, Tinder’s findings suggest that education level and income can take a backseat to banter, politeness, and connection.
Ms Dwyer said online dating could drive the trend “in one of two ways”.
On the one hand, apps often display education and job information, making filtering easier. On the other hand, they eliminate the structural boundaries of meeting only through work or study.
“There is some very early stage research from the US that suggests this could be a second explanation… but this only uses about 10 years of data,” Ms Dwyer said.
“Time will tell.”
If this early evidence is valid, the algorithms reshaping modern romance may also be loosening the decades-old pattern of like-for-like matching.
But it may take years to reveal in statistics whether swiping right expands social circles or sorts them in new ways.
Australia’s Associated Press is the beating heart of Australian news. AAP is Australia’s only independent national news channel and has been providing accurate, reliable and fast-paced news content to the media industry, government and corporate sector for 85 years. We inform Australia.
