Palestine Action co-founder wins permission to challenge ban | UK security and counter-terrorism

A Supreme Judge, the founding partner of the Palestinian action, the Minister of the Interior, may bring an unprecedented legal difficulty to the decision of prohibiting the prohibition of the fight against terrorism.

Justice Chamberlain said that the forbidden order against the direct action group gives the risk of “great harm to the public interest” due to a potential “creepy effect” in a legitimate political speech.

The judge referred to the Laura Murton case announced by Guardian, threatened to be arrested by armed officers for holding a sign that called “Free Gaza” and Palestinian Flag.

Chamberlain’s decision is that an organization was given a court case to challenge the prohibition for the first time in accordance with the Anti -Terror Law.

The judge said: “If the plaintiff said, the forbidden order is likely to have a significant creepy effect on the legitimate political speech of thousands of people, which will cause great harm to the public interest.

“Reports on the said police behaviors… It is obliged to have a creepy effect on those who want to express legitimate political views. This effect can be accepted correctly as an indirect consequence of the welfare order.”

“I see that the pledge order means that Article 10 and Article 10 (European Human Rights and Assembly Assembly) of the plaintiff and others mean a disproportionate intervention with Article 10 and Article 11 (respectively the European rights and parliamentary agreements).”

Huda Ammori, the founding partner of the group, is a turban turning point decision… Especially protesters-mostly elderly citizens were detained for more than 24 hours, raids of their homes and confronted with criminal prosecution at a time when they support the invoice action and express their support.

Since July 5, the first is believed to have been arrested more than 200 people since the Palestinian action, which is directly in an action group, and like the Islamic State and Boko Haram.

In November, the three -day hearing will increase the decision -making process of the Minister of Interior Yette Cooper and will create uncertainty on the fate of those who have recently been arrested within the scope of the Palestinian action on the Fate of the Fate or in the future.

The Ministry of the Interior argued that the Palestinian action was the POAC (prohibited organizations Appeal Commission), which the appropriate forum to challenge the ban, was fully determined by parliament for this purpose instead of the judicial examination.

However, Chamberlain said that Poac would not be able to hear the case before the middle of next year, whereas a judicial examination could be heard in this fall and that it was a strong public benefit for determining it as soon as possible as soon as possible.

Otherwise, in accordance with the law of terrorism, those responsible for criminal offenses, in courts that may make different decisions, can create a recipe for chaos, and try to challenge the legality of the prohibition decision.

In addition to concerns about the freedom of expression and freedom of protest, Chamberlain’s second ground for judicial examination, in addition to concerns about the freedom of expression, made it reasonable discussion of the Palestinian action before banning it and that it was a duty of consultation.

The judge rejected Ammori’s government’s permission to challenge the other six reasons, including the claim that the Minister of the Interior could not gather enough information about the activities of the Palestinian action or the impact of prohibition on groups related to the group.

Chamberlain refers to the gaze the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza ”. Last week, Foreign Minister David Lammy quoted the foreign ministers of the other 27 countries, which they said, “The suffering of civilians in Gaza reached new depths”.

The documents in the case showed that Cooper had made special discussions with help for three months before deciding to ban Palestinian action. He once decided to ban the group, but two days later he reversed the course.

Finally, the members of the Palestinian action entered the Brize Norton Airbase and falsified the two military planes with spray paint on June 20.

Joint Terrorism Analysis Center on March 7 (JTAC), Government organ based on MI5He prepared a secret report. He concluded that the majority of the activities of the Palestinian action would not be classified as terrorism on the grounds that the group “first uses direct action tactics”, which typically caused little damage to the property. “Common tactics include graffiti, small vandalism, occupation and locks,” he added.

However, JTAC concluded that the Palestinian action had to be banned, claiming that its protests have increased, and he said that terrorism actions were created, referring to three protests.

The Whitehall officials also supported a ban, but admitted that the prohibition of the group would be “relatively new”.

From the end of March, it is recommended in a series of events that allowed the group to be banned, but Cooper did not make a definite decision and often demanded more information. He supported the ban on May 14, but two days later he delayed the implementation because he wanted more details about the last activities of the Palestinian action.

A Whitehall Minute said that on June 20, until 2.15, Cooper’s Palestinian action will be banned at “speed”.

Ammori’s lawyers were rejected by Chamberlain, the application to suspend the effect of the forbidden order until the hearing was held in November. The judge also rejected the request of the Ministry of Interior to appeal his decision on Poac.

At the hearing of the last week, lawyers for Ammori also emphasized the arrest of a man in Leeds for carrying a poster for producing a poster from a special eye magazine: “Unacceptable Palestinian Action: Population of Military Aircrafts.