Pam Bondi seeks grand jury review of origins of Trump-Russia investigation | Trump administration
According to Associated Press, US Chief Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi is said to prosecutors to provide prosecutors to provide evidence of a large jury investigating the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.
The criminal investigation follows the referrals from Trump Management Intelligence officials and told a source AP, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, aims to investigate Moscow intervened in the 2016 elections.
Fox News first reported development.
The details remain uncertain about which former authorities face potential charges, where the proceedings will be and which special abuse allegations can support criminal indictments. The Ministry of Justice did not respond to the request for comments.
Considering the long -standing complaints on the Russian investigation expressed by Trump, who wanted the development of the Ministry of Justice to be imprisoned by the perceived political enemies, and that any criminal investigation will visit one of the most fragmented parts of modern American political history. It also emerges at a time when Trump administration is explained by criticism of handling documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trade investigation.
The first, annual investigation of the Russian election intervention resulted in the appointment of a private lawyer Robert Mueller, who provided more than one conviction against Trump deputy and allies, but did not form the evidence of a penalty conspiracy between Moscow and Republican campaign.
Mueller’s investigation documented its comprehensive Russian intervention in the 2016 elections and set more than one example in which Trump prevented justice, and the Special Advisor report was clearly said that the President was not explicitly disappeared.
The investigation has left most of Trump’s first presidency in the overshadow, and for a long time, he focused on senior officials from the intelligence and law enforcement officers, including former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, which he had fired in May 2017. The Ministry of Justice confirmed the investigation to both men in an unusual statement in July, but did not offer any details.
More than one special consultants, congress committees and the Ministry of Justice’s own inspector have examined and documented the efforts of Russia to intervene in the presidential elections of the 2016 presidential elections, the democratic e-mails to the presidential elections on behalf of Trump, including a hack and a leaking dump.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, led by the Republic, issued a comprehensive two -party report in 2020, which confirmed comprehensive Russian intervention and documented the contacts between the Trump campaign partners and the Russians. Campaign President Paul Manafort shared his internal polls with a Russian intelligence officer and welcomed the campaign with the Russian aid.
However, this result was aggressive in recent weeks because Tulsi Gabbard, the National Intelligence Director of Trump, Tulsi Gabbard and other allies, hoped that Russian intervention would arouse suspicion and hoped that Trump would create an Obama management effort to misrepresent Russia.
In a document published in July, Gabbard announced that his senior Barack Obama management officials did not realize that he did not attacked state election systems to manipulate the Russians in favor of the Russians in 2016. However, Obama’s administration did not claim that the votes were tampered with and that he expressed in detail the forms of other election intervention and external influence.
Last week, a new scream emerged by Chuck Grassley’s FBI Director Kash Patel, President of the Republican Senate Judiciary Committee last week, published a series of E -POSTA.
E -Posts was part of the classified suffix of a report published by the special advisor John Durham, who was appointed as the first Trump administration during the Russian investigation, during the Russian investigation.
Durham detected significant flaws in the investigation, but did not reveal any bombs to refute the existence of the Russian election intervention. The probe was acquitted by a jury, which produced three criminal cases, and the third was a guilty objection of making a false statement from a less-known FBI lawyer.
During the Trump administration, many investigations, including the General Inspector of the Ministry of Justice, concluded that the decision to open the investigation was right when the FBI made procedural mistakes in the Russian investigation.
The Republicans seized a plan in the heat of Clinton’s newly classified annex on July 27, 2016, claiming that Clinton approved a plan in the heat of the campaign to associate Trump with Russia.
However, the alleged author of E -Post, a senior official in a charitable organization established by the billionaire investor George Soros, said that he never sent E -Post to Durham’s team and that he never remembered to buy it.
Durham’s own report stated that the inspectors could not confirm the communication of the inspectors, and suggested that the message could probably be a “several composition of a few e -mail ği obtained by Russian hacking.
Associated Press contributed to reporting
