Pentagon demands journalists sign pledge not to gather certain information | US military

The US Army has issued new media restrictions that have not been authorized to release the press transitions or to cancel the risk or to undertake to commit any information for any other risk cancellation.
In a note Giving On Thursday, Pentagon continues to be transparent to encourage accountability and public confidence, ”he said. However, using a abbreviation for the recently reshaped war department under the chairmanship of Pete Hegseth, he added: “Dow information should be approved for the release of an appropriate authorized authority before it is classified.”
He said: “Only authorized persons who receive conformity for access, signed approved confidentiality contracts and need to know [classified national security information]. “
Journalists who report from Pentagon must now sign a pledge that accepts to restrict their movements in the building and accept not to access unauthorized materials. If they refuse to sign a hostage, the Pentagon press transitions will be canceled.
In a shipment on x, hegseth in question Friday: “Press” does not run the Pentagon – people are doing. The press is no longer allowed to walk around the halls of a safe facility. Insert a badge and follow the rules – or go home. “
The latest note follows Hegseth’s announcement about the new press restrictions in the Pentagon in May. These restrictions limit the movements of journalists in the building to certain areas, including press items, the food court and the courtyard. This is to leave the usual practice under the previous presidential administrations, which reporters typically have more freedom of movement in the Pentagon.
In a signal group conversation where a journalist was accidentally included in a signal group, he seriously limited media access after encountering Backlash to share sensitive information about US strikes in Yemen.
Since he took the office, Hegseth has exhibited an hostile attitude towards major media networks. New York Times, one of the private offices in the Pentagon, ordered the abolition of various long -term news organizations, including CNN, Politico and NPR.
Pentagon’s last note received criticism from Mike Balsamo, President of the National Press Club and journalists and free press defenders promise: “This is a direct attack on independent journalism in the place where independent examination is most important: the US army.
“If the news about our soldier needs to be approved by the government first, the public no longer receives independent reporting. Only the authorities get what they want to see. This should give every American alarm.”
Similarly, the Freedom of Press Foundation in question “This policy operates as a pre -restriction in the publication, which is accepted as the most serious violations of the freedom of press guaranteed by the first amendment of the US Constitution.
“The government cannot prohibit public information, claiming that journalists are just a secret,” the Foundation said.
Meanwhile, Thomas Evans, Head of National Public Radio (NPR), in question The output was taking this very seriously ”.
Evans, “We will work with other news organizations to withdraw,” he said. “We are the great fans of the first change and transparency, and we want the American people to understand what is done in their name.”
After the bulletin promotion
Pentagon’s restrictions on media access, Trump’s recently suggested that TV networks should be punished for the “negative scope .. This statement followed a widespread response to ABC’s suspension of Jimmy Kimmel late at night in a popular night late at night, which is that the senior comedian is working hard to benefit from the murder of Charlie Kirk, Tr Trump’s great.
Speaking at Air Force One on Thursday, Trump – without evidence – “97% [of major US networks are] Against me ”.
“They only give me bad press,” he said, he added that he believes that publishers’ licenses should be “taken”.
The US senator Cynthia Lummis was among those who approved Trump’s argument. Wyoming Republican recently told the US news website Semaphore He said that such licenses were “a privilege instead of“ rights, and that he did not believe that the first change was the “final right ..
Orum I feel culturally like something changed, Lum Lummis said partly. “And I think he needs to be aware of the changing things.”




