PETER HITCHENS: If Charles was truly green, he wouldn’t scrap the royal train – he would have two

Why was the royal train, green and magnificent scrapped? It doesn’t make sense.

The annual cost is 1 million £. Compare this with more than 1 million expenditure for the royal family last year with more than 1 million expenditure on a completely green helicopter journey, and each cost about £ 17,000.

To make them more comfortable, the palace plans to buy two new AgustaWestland helicopters, each of which is about £ 8 million.

The king is not money. Essentially, in 2011, thanks to a embarrassing agreement with Tor Premier David Cameron, the golden rivers are now flowing from the ‘Egemen Grant’ to the bank accounts.

Oh, and the ridiculously inflated cost of the two journeys made by Royal Train last year – each of which is 78,000 – an accounting trick by uploading all general expenses on these two trips.

If the royal family had used 100 times instead, the cost per journey would be much smaller. So why didn’t they use it anymore? Like that

Great safe. It is the only way that the people love to see it and about it, and the only existing way of transportation. In my opinion, many of them prefer selfish cars, helicopters and jets.

Does the king hate the railways because of his concern about the planet? Charles is a long -term gasoline of Jeremy Clarkson type, a long -term gasoline type of Jeremy Clarkson type?

Kin Charles, Vintage Aston Martin ‘is one of the great cars. I love design and lines. They are special… It was always a car to have ‘

The evidence is strong. Vintage Aston Martin ‘is one of the great cars. I love design and lines. They are special… It was always the car that had it ‘.

Well, if you’re a king, you’ve ever experienced traffic congestion, and the police can rely on Outiders escort.

And I am sure that if you can get the big racing driver Graham Hill, Graham Hill, the big racing driver Graham Hill, I have a lot of Clarksonian joy. But still a car is the curse of the environment that Charles claims that he loves very much.

For the last 70 years, our rural area and ugly concrete scars are cars that leave waste to city landscapes. If he was as green as he claimed, he would deterd their use. The strengthening of the king’s official cars with old wine and cheese extracts-does not make a real difference with an unleaded gasoline to provide va-va-voom.

The truth is that the king’s love of greenery is a pose. The real concern for the planet involves trying not to harm it. It involves living as little as possible.

But recently, environmentalism has become a strange belief – you can roar in cars, helicopters and special jets, but if you support net zero and windmills in a noisy way, it is considered sinless.

Like many spoiled outstanding figures, Charles worships the temple of Greta Thunberg.

He will see that he will not save him from his enemies who continue to despise him. But it seems to think it will happen.

Trains are the cleanest, safest, quietest, fastest, fastest and most up -to -date form of land transportation. They are not a residue, so they are now developing in the most advanced world, our government is trying to strangle them here 200 years ago, the country that invented them.

If the king was good, he wouldn’t have scrapped the royal train. There would be two.

One would be a pleasant nut, a steam vintage treasure that would progress throughout the country and offer trips to distinguished citizens.

The other will be a super expression of 190Mph, which is adorned with royal symbols, accelerates the channel tunnel to the capital of the Republic of Europe, to regret that they have to get rid of their monarchies and why we need to protect ours.

Oh, it’s just.

The left wing was spoiled to ride like the royal family of Cherie (but my old Blayite bosses buried the story)

“ News came to me, Premier’s left channel wife Cherie Blair, was using the Queen’s train. No politician or politician’s wife had never done it before, ” he writes Hitchens

The scrapping of the royal train reminds me of one of the most strange episodes for newspapers for many years.

In May 1998, I was working for another article, which had been a century Toray but took over by the supporters of the Blair regime.

The news came to me, the Premier’s left -wing wife, Cerie Blair, was using the Queen’s train. No politician or politician’s wife had done it before. It was at a G8 summit and came together with the wives of other world leaders.

This was dynamite, but the wrong type of dynamite for my new bosses wished not to go.

After a lot of shaking, they put on one of the most dramatic news I wrote at the bottom of page 31.

He was so well hidden, a competitor ran the same story, as if he was defeated, a few months later he ran under a ‘special’ poster.

He wouldn’t even give any 10 answers, but I always wondered if the planned publication of two British nurses from the prison in Saudi Arabia was a coincidence that evening. Certainly, everything else continued from the main news pages of all articles.

Similarly, I am constantly wondering how many important events have disappeared.

It is blind to justice for BBC Letby

Lucy Letby’s convictions were seriously challenged by the heavyweight expert

The biggest obstacles of the re -opening of the Letby case are BBC. He hates to accept this

Letby’s convictions were seriously challenged by heavyweight experts. On Tuesday, he incorrectly reported that the courts had lost two appeals against these convictions, which gave the impression that he was much more generous than him. Not that. He rejected the objection permission.

Surprisingly, they have now accepted their mistakes, but only on websites. The time they started to deal with this case in an inappropriate way.