google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Prince Harry ‘broke unspoken rule’ ahead of King Charles crunch talks | Royal | News

A royal interpreter claimed that Prince Harry had made a rule that was not discussed in his attempts to organize reconciliation negotiations with King Charles, who completed his efforts to rebuild his relationship with his father. The violation is about Harry’s public comments on private family issues.

Royal commentator Charlotte Griffiths spoke GB News He may be careful about the outcome of the conversation with the public about special issues, that is, about future meetings with the King’s son. Royal commentator talked about the potential needs of the King: “I think it will be willing to meet his demands, and a very simple request, ‘If I talk to you, can he not leak in Oprah Winfrey or another program?’ ‘

“Some basic rules for communication.

The commentator added: “Harry really wants to compromise and talk to his father freely. He can’t reach his father right now. He needs to pass his assistants.”

In May, the Duke of Sussex spoke with BBC about his return to England and his relationship with his family. After losing his last legal difficulty in his security against the British government, he commented – a decision he said that he left him vulnerable to threats on his life.

Prince BBC said to America: “I don’t know how much my father is – this will not talk to me for security, but it would be nice to compromise.”

The royal expert emphasized the seriousness of this violation: “The cardinal that speculates about the health of the king broke the rule.”

“Someone, ‘how long Charles took, now organizes this meeting’, I do not think it is at that stage.” He said.

Liam Maguire, who managed Duke’s chief communication officer Meredith Maines and Harry and Meghan’s British Public Relations Team, met with King Communication Secretary in the non -royal league near Clarence House on Wednesday.

The images were obtained by mail on Sunday, a source quoted the article meeting that there was no “official agenda”, but there was “things that both sides want to talk about”.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button