Prince Harry considers founding new charity after Sentebale dispute | Prince Harry
A spokesman said the Duke of Sussex was thinking of establishing a new humanitarian aid after a very public dispute.
Prince Harry resigned in March as a boss of the charity in March to support the Board of Trustees who had previously resigned against the chairman of the board of directors who balanced the charges of bullying and harassment against the royal.
The philanthropy works in Botsvana and Lesoto, especially in Lesoto, which supports the health and welfare of those with HIV and AIDS.
In 2006, Lesotho Prince Seeiso, who founded Sentebeale in honor of the Wales Princess Diana, resigned as a boss.
The Assistance Commission issued a report in the episode on Tuesday and criticized all parties for making the Serpinti open to the public with interviews and expressions, but the war of words continued.
At the beginning of this week, a source said that the queue was “emotionally destructive ve and Dr Chandauka described his comments as“ no hostile acquiring ”.
On Sunday, Duke spokesman said: “The Duke is strictly determined to continue to work by supporting Lesoto and Botsvana’s children and young people about 20 years ago.
“This support is not taken. All options remain on the table; this is starting a new charity, whether it is trying to support charities operating in the same sector in the region.”
The charity regulator, who could not investigate the allegations of individual bullying, said that he could not find evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including women’s hostility or misogynoir in the charity institution, but accepted the “perception of ill -treatment” he felt by some people.
The Board of Trustees, who resigned, said in a statement that the Commission has chosen to ignore the fundamental concerns with them under the leadership and supervision of the Syntabale’s chair and the evidence that they have chosen to ignore the evidence that arises with them ”.
In response to the findings, synthemy said: “The aid commission is clearly clear that the commission is not responsible for judging or mediating internal disputes. This is, bullying, harassment, women’s hostility, misogynoir and so on.
“As a result, the Commission has not explored any individual claims and therefore did not make any findings about individuals, including Prince Harry. The issues that are not investigated by the Commission can be handled and handled more appropriate than the commission.”
