Prime minister’s benefit cuts U-turn leaves backbenchers feeling bruised

“What an absolute bloody chaos!”

When we say that this is now a non -Varnic view of a Labor Party Deputy who wants to support the benefit plans of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, you understand how much anger this line provoked and still provokes.

And there’s a lot that is still not happy and forces it for more changes or plans to vote for measures.

“Not the decision of many people. They’re dealing with a broken bill,” he says.

After Backbench Labor MPs rebelled against the government’s proposed welfare reforms, the Prime Minister conquered, saying that more strict criteria would only be valid for new plaintiffs.

“Obviously some will be calmed by at least by privileges, but there is still a significant number of rivals, a third MP text,” components, voter surgeons and so on.

Debbie Abrahams, the deputy of the Labor and Pension Election Committee, said to the BBC: “Concessions will be a very good start, very good concessions and existing plaintiffs. However, there are concerns about the new plaintiffs.

In other words, it does not seem to be won yet.

Some say that the disability labor, which defines itself as an independent socialist society of the United Kingdom Labor Party, still calls all MPs to oppose plans.

Let’s see how the opinion and mood of the Parliamentary Labor Party settled until Monday.

Many workers, which are very clear, feel Backbencher feel very rotten.

Downing Street “See us as a discomfort, will be managed, not listening.

Prime Minister and Chief of General Staff Morgan Mcsweeney’s quite blunt evaluations are not difficult to find.

Concerned MPs say that many people who are responsible for party discipline express their concerns with the Downing Street.

“Either they didn’t think, or they didn’t think that new deputies would have balls to stand against them.”

“Maybe the moment they finally get it,” he reflects.

Others are afraid that the six -month cycle of Chancellor Rachel Reeves will mean that the hunting model will take place for interruptions, as they see, as they see, who want to meet their imposed financial rules.

Some think that the only solution will be a new chancellor over time. Senior voices in the government in which Starmer and Reeves personize the Modern Labor Party in the government. These voices say that it is very important to be seen as responsible for the country’s finance, and Reeves’ rules help to achieve this.

The people around the Prime Minister will be satisfied with the end of the week, and hopes will be hopeful to choose the least option to deal with the outbreak of the advantages of advantages.

And they can allow a moment to be reflected in the best part of a year in the government.

Next Friday points to the first anniversary of the general elections and since Sir Keir Starmer has become Prime Minister, 12 months.

He interviewed his biography, journalist and former Labor Party Communication Director Tom Baldwin as a part of this. Observer.

Inside, Sir Keir said he was very gloomy last summer and regretted the country through immigration in recent years. He said too He said immigration turned England into “foreign island”. And rejects another part of his political strategy of his first year.

This interview, which spent the week fighting with many people in the left and center of the Labor Party, managed to find a way to alienate its allies.

“Ugly”, “weak”, “just a few of Starmer Loyalists’ election words – yes, loyal.

There is a special anger in the perception that he threw his closest helpers under a bus.

A high -level government source said they were very angry to talk about it.

He currently leaves the impression that the Prime Minister is a politician who cannot do anything right.

And again, again, he asks a greater question about what the Prime Minister represents.

If these words about migration were a mistake, what really thinks?

In the second year in No 10, it will be the key to find a definition and avoid roosters.