Prince Harry’s former charity hit with new blow as London staff face redundancy | Royal | News
On the other hand, Chandaek complained about the aid commission and claimed that bullying, hostility and racism continued against him.
As reported by The Times, a series of trustees resigned and blamed Chandukuka’s “almost dictator” style. Prince Harry is believed to accept the decision of people who resigned.
Although the problem is a personal blow to the Prince, it seems to have damaged the charity that lost donations and financing.
It is believed that this contributes to the decision of the charity of the charity, including the global finance and adaptation president, to make four of the four of the Five London staff unnecessary.
As Times has put forward, it is believed that the aid organization is a result of not having sufficient donor financing, and that the personnel have been made unnecessary in Africa. It has also been reported that the aid organization has used a lot of £ 1.4 million for more than twenty years.
Only weeks ago, the aid commission criticized both Chandauka and Prince Harry for the public saliva and “seriously influenced the reputation of the charity and faced the risk of trusting the public in general”. Although the report did not decide on individual employment disagreements, there was no evidence that he was a culture of bullying, harassment or women of women.
Since the President accused him of “bullying” and “harassment ,, he was likely to be a relief for the prince.
The synthemy spokesperson, Daily Mail, said that surplus decisions are a “planned restructuring” and uncertainty that public saliva does not help this year. “The synthemy committee, which was first discussed in 2024, took a deliberate and responsible step to size the labor force right because of the increasing uncertainty regarding the uncertainty regarding the uncertainty related to events such as International Donor Finance and Polo (Fund creation activity), such as USAID.
“Global restructuring has aimed to improve productivity, to improve productivity, to increase the high -level executive roles of the transition to South Africa and to respond to service provision demands. False is the idea that any restructuring is due to a ‘fund crisis’, but a planned restructuring.”
Express.co.uk approached the synthemy for comment.
