Prosecutor resists Trump pressure to charge Letitia James
US President Donald Trump and New York Chief Public Prosecutor Letitia James.
Brian Snyder | David Dee Delgado | Reuters
A senior prosecutor in Virginia is resisting pressure to search for the guilty indictment of President Donald Trump’s Trump’s long -term antagonist New York Chief Prosecutor Letitia James. MSNBC reported on Monday.
Prosecutor Elizabeth Yusi is working in the eastern region of the US lawyer, who recently received the indictment of another goal of James Comey, former Trump’s former FBI Director.
According to MSNBC’s report, “Virginia’s eastern region of Norfolk office Yusi controls great criminal prosecution, James’in mortgage fraud against the man’s trust to believe that there is no possible reason to believe.” He said.
“Yusi plans to present its results to the President’s new temporary US lawyer Lindsey Halligan.
Halligan was founded by Trump after he resigned under the pressure of Trump after his predecessor Erik Siebert opposed the charges against Comey.
Shortly thereafter, Halligan received a great jury to cause Comey to accuse of lying during the testimony. Senate Judiciary Committee On September 30, 2020.
Comey rejects the allegations.
At the weekend, Trump called James “Scum” and in a social media mission that wants to be dismissed as a chief prosecutor.
In a previous social media mission, Trump on September 20, US Chief Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi James, Comey and Sen. The man called Schiff to prosecute D-Calif.
Trump’s Bill Pulte, assigned to chair the federal housing financing agency, claimed that James’s nephew Virginia, Virginia, claimed that he was a mortgage fraud.
James ‘lawyer Abbe Lowell rejected James’ proposal that the house was the primary residence to obtain a more appropriate credit rate.
“Lowell, a lawyer’s power form accidentally listed the house as primary housing, but James is the primary house of the house when asked whether the loan application ‘no’ checks,” he said. “In addition, according to Lowell, James sent an e -mail to the mortgage broker stating that the house would not be my primary residence ‘.”
In early September, James objected to the decision of Trump and his company to impose a $ 500 million penalty in connection with the business fraud of the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal said that the fine violated that the US Constitution forbids extreme fines.
The court found that a court judge was a business fraud of Trump and others.
In this case, James’ case against him refused to do wrong.
