NHS hospital funding in England to be tied to patient ratings, ministers say | Health policy
Ministers, money for hospitals in the UK, the government’s 10 -year NHS plan in the country, one of the health bosses assigned to implement the public, unless the public is re -connected to the existential threat warned.
The precaution that health service providers may lose some of their funds if their patients are unhappy is a part of a package that the health secretary hopes that the health secretary will encourage investment in services that can prevent the need for hospital visits and encourage patients more.
However, clinicians stated that the proposal risks operated on NHS are concerned with a blunt tool rather than the necessary scalpel.
Pursuant to the first proposals reported by Times, the patients should be asked whether they want all financing because they need to go to a regional fund, instead of a ratio to continue to be paid to the service they use. According to Times, approximately 10% of “standard payment rates” can be directed if a patient is unhappy.
“This will be introduced in places where there is a history of evidence that very bad service and evidence that patients are not listened to in a statement on Saturday, the Ministry of Health and Social Care.
However, Matthew Taylor, General Manager of NHS Confederation, said: “No member has raised this idea as a way to improve care with us, and according to our knowledge, it does not adopt this model internationally.”
He said: “Patient experience is determined much more than its individual interactions with the clinician, and there is a risk that the providers can be punished for more systemic problems unless they are designed and evaluated very carefully.”
Other measures are designed to help people in society to be treated before the need for hospitalization. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, “Patients do not make a GP appointment that cost NHS, they will reach A & E, which cost 400 £.”
The new president of the NHS in the UK said that the service was “building mechanisms to keep the public away”. Sir Jim Mackey said to Telegraph: “We really made it harder and probably we were all at the end of it. You have a relative in the hospital, so you play a number in a ward that no one answered.
Mackey warned that the interruption of the connection between NHS services and the public may lead to loss of public health service. “Great concern: If we don’t catch this and don’t deal with the tempo, we’ll lose the population. If we lose the population, we’ve lost NHS.”
Streeting said on Wednesday, the government’s 10 -year plan, when it comes to health services, “he claims to have unequal access to information and elections,” to take one of the most prominent health inequalities, “he said.
Mackey said: iz We should somehow redirect; how we find people who need us, how we will stop thinking: ‘If you are very busy, there will be a pain in the ass’ and how to find what you need and how to rank. ”
