google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Hollywood News

Rajinikanth’s Coolie censor row: Madras High Court dismisses Sun TV Network’s appeal against ‘A’ certificate

The Supreme Court of Madras rejected a civil appeal made by Sun TV Network Limited against Rajinikanth-Starrer ‘A’ on 28 August 2025 Thursday. AiryThus, it makes it unacceptable for people under the age of 18 to watch the film in cinema theaters.

Adalet TV Thamilselvi rejected the appeal opened by the production house under the 5th episode of the Copyright Law of 1957. The appealed person decided that the film’s Central Film Certificate Board (CBFC), the violent content of the film and the continuous depiction of smoking and quor findings, and that it was not suitable for watching.

The Board defending the decision in front of the Supreme Court, 58 (2) section of the Cinematographer Law, can be considered in accordance with the center, CBFC’yi designed for the public exhibition designed for the appropriate certificate to identify the principles that will be directed to the principles, he said.

Accordingly, in 1991, the center had published instructions that required CBFC’s cinema environment to be responsible and sensitive to the values ​​and standards of the society, that it provides clean and healthy entertainment, and that films to make aesthetic value and cinematic good standard.

In accordance with these goals, CBFC was expected to be sure that anti-social activities and violence were not glorified or justified in cinema. Furthermore, he was expected to avoid the scenes of violence, persecution or horror and violence scenes that may have the impact of the audience from humanity.

The CBFC told the court that each film is completely tried by the board of directors and not only one or two visuals or scenes. Airy It was examined according to the guidelines and was found only by a five -member examination committee to be given only ‘A’ certificate and a 10 -member review committee.

The Board also told the Court that it was completely different from the members of the examination committee members of the examination committee and that the latter was chaired by a famous film director and a CBFC member with eight national award and 15 state prize buyers.

“From watching the film and detailed and stale discussion, the review committee suggested that ‘A’ certificate. Airy Because it is frequently and comprehensive violence, in addition to the depiction of smoking and drinking liquor with occasionally bad language use, ”he said.

The review committee reported to filmmakers that during an oral hearing, they may have to edit specific images if they wanted an U/A certificate for the film. ASG, “The appealing person was not interested in making any deduction in FLLM to make it appropriate for the U/A certificate, and he accepted the degree of ‘A’, AS ASG added.

In addition, the production company, on August 4, 2025 immediately after the review committee should approach the court, ‘A’ certificate and accepted the film on August 14, 2025 after publishing the film in the theaters, not only ‘A’ certificate should convey the decision to convey.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button