Scientists rush to bolster climate finding Trump administration aims to undo | US news
Experienced climatic scientists organize a public interpretation of a US Department of Energy (Doe) report that arouses suspicion of scientific consensus on the climate crisis.
The report, published at the end of last month, claimed that the worries about the planetary fossil fuels were overly inflated and that the climate was full of misinformation; It was an attempt to support a bid from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reclaim the “finding finding finding of danger”, which constitutes the legal basis of almost all US climate regulations.
Andrew Dessler, a climatic researcher who was given to the report from Texas A&M University, said, “A public interpretation of experts may be useful, because Texas A&M University Climate Research Andrew Desssler, who regulates the report, is injected into a decision -making process of political, economic or ideological thoughts. It can explain its accuracy and robustness to increase. ”
As the response encourages the Trump administration’s opposing and unproven perspectives, it comes as part of a wider wave of experts’ attempts to support established climate science.
National Sciences, Engineering and Medical Academies (NASEM), the best scientific consultant group of the country, has initiated the “quick” examination of the latest evidence of how greenhouse gases threaten human health and prosperity-a movement that constitutes the danger.
NASEM, who advised EPA and other federal agencies, plans to publish EPA’s findings in September to inform EPA’s decision to find danger. The initiative is an extremely extraordinary application from the group, which is rented by the organization as self-financed by the organization.
“It is very important to inform Federal policy production with the best scientific evidence available,” he said, President of the National Academy of Sciences, said Marcia McNutt.
The Trump administration’s efforts to prevent access to data inspired the return. This month, the President dismissed the President of the Bureau of Statistics after saying that the data he published was “fraudulent”.
In previous weeks, Federal officials also deleted important climate data and national climate assessments and reports such as the US Global Change Research Program from the government websites. Management has changed 70% of the information on the official environmental websites According to a report, the research group, published last week, for the first 100 days of the first Trump administration, according to the report of environmental data and governance attempt.
In the light of these actions, public environmental data project and Corner stone sustainability data initiative He worked to protect and publish the data in which the federal government was stored from the public.
“The attacks on science are dangerous because they are eroding one of the most effective means of society in order to understand the world and to decide the public interest,” dessler said. “When political or ideological powers weaken scientific institutions or discredit experts, they weaken our ability to use this powerful vehicle.”
A EPA spokesman who was requested to comment on NASEM review repeated a comment presented at the beginning of this month: “Congress never authorized EPA to apply greenhouse gas arrangements for automobiles and trucks.”
If the Clean Air Life determines that EPA manager emissions endanger public health or welfare, EPA allows to set emission standards for cars. This includes greenhouse gas emissions due to the finding of danger.
Diederich, a spokesman for the Ministry of Energy, who was requested to comment on the Doe report supporting EPA’s position, repeated an earlier comment. “This report critically evaluates many areas of many scientific investigations that are frequently given by the relevant political organs such as the United Nations or the previous presidential administrations, not by scientists.”
The UN and the United States regularly gathered the best scientists to produce scientific climatic reports that warned that urgent action is necessary to prevent emissions.
DietDerich also said in the report that “he is looking forward to dealing with important comments”.
However, Dessler said, “The real question will listen to us,” he said.
