Scott Morrison op-ed flops, Tim Wilson reads Crikey
Bouquet?: Citizens Senator Ross Cadell’s mini-Essays about the various gifts received, it can be difficult to keep up with, which is the frequency of revealing everything. But, A garnous monks We caught our eyes.
On February 6, Cadell said that he received a fascinating rose switch with a red -valuable decorative necklace in the middle of the flower with the permission of Amir Maimon, Israel’s Ambassador of Australia. The gift is handmade by Rockets Rockets Into Lose, an Israeli company, an Israeli company, which re -used the remains of a Palestinian rocket fired during the Gaza War.
As Cadell wrote: “Roses to rockets’ literally transforms the means of death and war weapons into great objects of love, growth and great hope for a peaceful future.
Great, Scott: Now American Global Strategies Vice President Scott Morrison written an op-ed for Wall Street Journal US President Donald Trump should compete in one of the most important geopolitical theaters of the future, arguing that the partners of the future should establish a third “column” focusing on space technology under the AUKUS Pact.
None WSJ subscription? You may have read OP-ED through your subscription. Australia, Which one commercial partnership with WSJ. In this case, this is not necessary. . Self A reporter was appointed to write A story Although Morrison’s view is online for three hours, about OP-ED, marked as “special”.
It wouldn’t take long to write the story. 486 of the word 643 were directly removed from Morrison’s OP-ED. This is 75%. Fortunately, the risk of a copyright violation is low.
So how did Morrison’s OP-Ed performance? WSJ area? Based on the comments, he hasn’t made much leap yet. During the writing, there were an average of 225 comments each of the last 10 pieces of visibility. The upper piece, which is a masterpiece about the Iranian situation, made 1,010 comments.
Morrison had 19 this morning, one of them: “4 comments in 9 hours. The former Aussie Prime Minister is not very interested in what he said.”
What is happening now: In the last installment of how this real life is, my dear God, Donald Trump this morning, probably referring to Tucker Carlson’s Interview with Ted CruzHe said he asked Carlson if Iran was good for having nuclear weapons.
“He didn’t like it, Tr Trump said. “And I said, ‘If it’s not a problem for you, then you and I have a difference’, but it’s not really a problem for him.”
“There is no way to allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon because the whole world will explode.” Continued.
The strange part of this Ad-Lib interpretation, the interpretation of America’s potential war with a foreign nation? Italy’s Juventus football team players, all the time stands behind the US president.
TIM’s price: Benjamin Clark’s latest review of Tim Wilson’s LinkedIn profile drew attention to a small detail in his biography – he called Wilson on earth as one of the most distinguished political strategists of his political generations ??
After the track was published, Wilson made a small fine adjustment to his profile and attributing the quote to someone else. Sydney Morning Herald columnist Jenna price.
Everyone says hello to Tim! (Or at least the person in charge of watching him in his team Crirase is talking.)
AI cannot get satisfaction: One of the biggest stories of education is how AI bots such as Chatgpt damage the sector. Students flocked to use the vehicles cheat. Teachers Robot Written Essays They waste their time and create their beliefs that they can really help their students.
Related article block place holder
Article ID: 1210407
However, this is an opportunity for the AI sector. A summer industry of Edutech companies promised to help both teachers and students (if they are widely considered, they will create AI’s dystopic Ouroboros, who marked the experiments written by AI).
Such a company is Australia’s “Jeddle ,, which launched a new tool,“ it offers access to a team of real -life expert markets and AI tools trained by the teacher to get instant feedback about your business ”.
The company claims to be “98% student satisfaction ve and lists several references on its website. However Crirase He couldn’t help but I didn’t notice a little notice: photos of so -called happy student customers such as “Advantika” and “Luke” were stock images used elsewhere on the Internet. As in it, they were fake people.
We asked Jeddle why he used images of non -customers and whether the shining references were fake (it is possible to put only one face in a name), but I did not hear. Why didn’t he use the abundance of existing vehicles to create faces produced by the new AI?
