Legal experts say Trump’s indictment of Comey is a test of justice

Washington – Under a Phoenix asphalt in 2016, former president Clinton and USA Atty. General Loretta Lynch held a random meeting on a special jet. The stock market caused a political fire storm. At a time when the Ministry of Justice investigated the democratic candidate of the democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, the emergence of nonconformity created a national scandal.

“Lynch made law enforcement decisions for political purposes,” he said, Republican rival Donald Trump that year, Then a writer Meeting on Twitter. “Totally illegal!”

It was the beginning of a model claiming the political intervention of the democrats and career officials, regardless of evidence of the political intervention of the Ministry of Justice.

Now, Trump’s claims of politicizing the justice system have become the basis of the most aggressive political prosecution in modern American history.

St. “What Trump does with US lawyers now is exactly what the authorities who created these offices would do – the founders did not imagine the office of the founders of this way,” said Peter Kastor, Head of the Department of History of Washington at the University of Washington in Louis.

“From the beginning of the Ministry of Justice,” he added, “One of the most remarkable things is how it is never used in this way.”

On Thursday, Federal accusations were made at Trump’s Express Management, claiming that he had given a false testimony before the Congress against former FBI Director James Comey and tried to block a congress judiciary five years ago.

After Trump fired a US lawyer with suspicions about the power of the case, he provided him from a loyal jury. General Pam Bondi is clearly on social media to make charges against him and others.

“James Comey is a dirty police,” He wrote on social media After the charges. “Make America wonder again!”

Competented by Trump in 2017, Comey rejects the charges.

“My family and I know that there are costs to keep up with Donald Trump for years, but we could not imagine that he lived in another way,” he said. “We will not live on our knees and you should not.

“My heart was broken for the Ministry of Justice. But I trust the Federal Judicial System,” Comey continued. “And I am innocent. So let’s try and protect faith.”

Behind the charges against Comey, legal experts see a weak lawsuit that is used as a cudgel in a political persecution to Trump’s perceived enemy. Comey is accused of giving a leakage authority to the media about a FBI investigation through an anonymous source.

Just the last example. During the summer, Bill Pulte, the director of Trump’s Federal Housing Finance Agency, used his position to blame three of the political enemies of the President’s mortgage fraud, and directed the cases to the Ministry of Justice for potential charges – actively encouraged by Trump online.

Tr This is not a list, Tr Trump said Thursday, asking if more prosecution came. “I think there will be others. They were corrupt. These were the radical radical left democrats. Comey was actually Dem. – Worse than a democrat.”

The president’s deficit as a partisan tool threatens a new age of political persecution that can backfire to its allies. The Supreme Court clearly stated that the presidents gained broad immunity for their actions while serving. But not their helpers. Bondi, Pulte et al., Like Commey, is obliged to occasionally witness the House and Senate committees under the oath.

“The Comey’s indictment draws attention because the personalized politicization is very clear, Bow said Andrew Rudalevige, Professor of Government at Bowdain College. “The same actions carried out in a secret way seem to be scandal, because they – and the fact that they have been declared very clearly does not make them less corrupt.”

However, the Comey case can only be seen as a test of the applicability of a policy -based prosecution. Already, Trump’s lawyers for other legal goals, lawyers said they planned to use open threats against them to get the court against their customers.

This week, the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended vocal advocate for criminal charges against political enemies as a matter of “accountability” of Trump.

Leavitt said, ız We will not tolerate gas light from anyone who tries to say that he was the president who armed Doj on the other side, ”Leavitt said.

“You are looking at people [California Sen.] Like Adam Schiff and James Comey and likes [New York Atty. Gen.] Letitia James, whom the president is rightly disappointed, continued. “ He wants to account for these corrupt fraudsters who abuse their powers and exploit office oath to target the former president. “

However, Trump’s accusations against the democrats have routinely failed in the tests of general, journalism investigation and public investigation.

When Trump was investigated on the 2016 race and the potential coordination between the Russian Government, the liberal, the “Deep State” report of Cabal’s special prosecutor’s report, claimed that he was behind an investigation based on the result of the “numerous connections between the Russian government and the Trump campaign”.

And when he was accused of federal crimes of his highly classified material and his efforts to overthrow the consequences of the 2020 Presidential elections, he rejected the accusations as a witch hunt that made a claim that had no foundation by the President Biden and the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Kastor said that the special advisor investigations against Trump were “not persecution but prosecution”.

Kastor, “allegations that surrounded him – allegations – investigations are appropriate,” he added. “This is not investigations.”