Starmer insists he has confidence in under-fire McSweeney amid pressure over Mandelson appointment
Sir Keir Starmer insisted that Peter Mandelson’s pressure on the US Ambassador to the US Ambassador to his participation in the US Ambassador Morgan, Chief of General Staff Morgan Mcsweeney.
Despite his concerns about his connections with Jeffrey Epstein, Lord Mandelson personally pushed for his appointment.
British Ambassador of the United States was dismissed dramatically by asking serious questions about the Prime Minister’s decision on Thursday, due to new revelations about his convicted relationship with the convicted pedophile.
The allegations about the participation of Mr. Mcsweeney revealed questions about whether he was the right person for the highest level of street work, former Minister of Foreign Minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind, claims that the revelations may mean that the allegations would have to fire Sir Keir’s official.
However, Downing Street pulled a shovel behind the fire of the fire on Friday morning. When asked if the Prime Minister still trusts him, his spokesman said: “Of course, the Prime Minister trusts his best team. And they continue to work on this government.”
Sir Malcolm Times came after telling Radio: “Mcsweeney may be stupid or not in his advice. I just don’t know. I don’t think exactly what he’s doing with the Prime Minister.
“That’s why I don’t think we can reach results.
Meanwhile, Tora leader Kemi Badenoch immediately seized reports and called on both Sir Keir and Mcsweeney to explain themselves to the public.
He said: “These last revelations pointed out that Keir Starmer’s terrible judgment and all the documents related to Peter Mandelson’s appointment should be released immediately.
“If it is true that Morgan Mcsweeney, Chief of Starmer or Chief of General Staff, invalidates security services as allegedly, they need to explain why they do it immediately.”
Tell a senior labor figure Independent Sir Keir should look at 10 operations again after the dismissal of Lord Mandelson.
They said, “I don’t meet Morgan Mcsweeney fans,” they said. “It is well known to despise the deputies”.
In the meantime, the former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said, “A choice emerges for Keir. Mcsweeney is going or going.”
Lord Mandelson’s dismissal came after a series of shocking revelations, including E -mails, which showed support for Epstein because he was accused of sex crimes.
Downing Street insisted that Lord Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was “financially different ından during the appointment of his“ depth and scope ”.
Among the E -mails published in the afternoon on Wednesday, Lord Mandelson included passages that Epstein told Epstein to özgün fight for early release ”shortly before he was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment.
For ambassadors, it is understood that the veterinary process was closed to ministers, so neither Sir Keir Starmer nor the Foreign Secretary David Lammy had no access to detailed information.
Download Street could not say whether the e -mails described in the press this week have created a part of this veterinary process – that is, although it corresponded with Epstein, it may be approved by the veterinary service.
Since then, the conservatives said that the government planned to try to vote in the Parliament to enable the government to publish all the information about the appointment of Lord Mandelson, and they planned to put more pressure to reveal exactly what the Prime Minister knew and when he knew.
And when questions about the Prime Minister’s decision, after two resignations of a more than a week, he supported the public, the President of the Foreign Affairs Committee, the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs, asked him to allow the next US Ambassador to Washington to veterinarian.
Dik We wanted to do this with Mandelson, Em Emily Thornberry said, arguing that the government should meet the examination.
On Friday, a Cabinet Minister Accepted Lord Mandelson’s appointment “High risk, high award”.
Scotland Secretary Douglas Alexander said that all three of the last workers’ ministers were a “high -risk” appointment, but later that the appointment was “an unusual presidential administration”.
