STEPHEN GLOVER: Starmer has handed Farage a golden chance to prove he’s Prime Minister material – by rising above the bile

Sooner or later, most American trends enter our shores. Some are good, others are bad.

In the United States, politics has become more confrontational and separatist than this country for many years. With the emergence of Donald Trump, the debate became even more vituperative and abusive.

Our politicians were not affected for a while. In the last election, for example, the campaign was intact. There was a number of semi -real and outright lying spreading. However, Trumpian discourse was largely avoided.

Now. In the last few days, political language has been a sudden and worrying way. So far, words and expressions that have been almost completely alien to our traditions have been thrown.

How ironic is that this new invitation has fallen out of Nigel Farage’s mouth, who does not make any bones about being a friend and fan of the raw American president.

The worst was the words of Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy. On Tuesday, he accused Farage of flirting with Hitler Youth, an organization for the young Nazis who dispersed in 1945.

Lammy’s Historical Granding Titrek – Once upon a time during a TV exam, Henry VII.

Young Farage was an unfounded rumor that Hitler’s youth aligned with the values ​​of his youth as a school child. It was reported that Lammy apologized, but it would be better to say that he had gently withdraw his unpleasant claim.

On Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy said Farage’s ‘flirting with Hitler youth’

The explosion of Lammy was to describe the reform as a fascist. He was undoubtedly slander. More importantly, it was the language of political groove. While trying to find Farage as an extremist, he adopted the pro -extreme discourse.

Starmer was not much better. Normally, a man who resembled a very nervous undertaker turned into a demagogue. Recently, he described Farage as a ‘enemy’ hiding in plain views’. The reform was repeatedly called ‘separatist’ by the Prime Minister, while immigration policies were rejected as ‘racist’ and ‘immoral’.

In his conference speech on Tuesday, Starmer opened the bottle and accused Farage of following the ‘complaint policy’ with racist policies’ and the worst of, of course not to like England. This is ridiculous. Of course, the Prime Minister described himself as a patriotic who loved his country and hugged the union flag again.

Yesterday, ‘Farage Boats’ channel to call the migratory boats left his senses – apparently argued that Brexit was why. Is it pierced? Is there any deficiency that he does not blame the reform leader?

In the meantime, fewer workmanship figures make pot shots in Farage, the health secretary WES streets are labeling him ‘Mr Money Bags’ and ‘an artist posing as the voice of the people’.

In particular, there were insults of the right -hand man Darren Jones, who compared the regulator, Starage with an impressive Andrew Tate, who confessed to himself with an investigation of rape, human trafficking and a crime gang.

In 1948, Labour’s left -wing hero Aneurin Bevan described Tories as ‘lower than Vermin’, a loose mouth Angela Rayner called them ‘filth’ a few years ago. The left has been a passion for denial for a long time.

But rarely, if any, in British political history, it has such intense bile torrent in a very short time than any political party. Garnous American President is behind.

Farage has the option to rise above the name of the Labor Party

Probably we shouldn’t be surprised that David Lammy, Peter Mandelson and other labor figures specialize in abuse Trump – until Starmer decides to suck him in a compelling way. Lammy once condemned Donald as ‘Neo-Nazi Sociopath’.

Labor is to bring insults home – so far is to pollute our relatively civilized political intersection with Epithets reserved for foreign leaders whom he had previously hated.

Of course it won’t work. I don’t believe you love the British people’s politicians when they talk like Pub Braggarts. Nigel will not be able to realize that the language used to demonize the farage and reform has only labor stalks for hysterical and helplessness.

In addition, there will be no many people shot to thank Labour for implying that they are racist. This error recalls Hillary Clinton’s description of Trump supporters in 2016 as a ‘burnout basket’. The first course of democratic politics is not to abuse voters.

Will we inevitably unite in a kind of separatist politics that disrupts the United States in this way? A lot depends on the reaction of the Nigel Farage object. It has the option of ascension over Labour’s name call and appearing statesmen.

The leader of the reform is a brave man who devotes most of his adult life to bringing the vision of this country. For such a brave politician, he can be surprisingly thin -skinned.

On Tuesday, he released a video where we saw his best. He complained about Labour’s invitation, not in an unnatural way, but did not go down to the same depths. The worst thing he said was that Starmer was not ‘appropriate’ to become a prime minister, a view of more than half of the country.

If he can protect this dignity under severe provocation and respond calmly to Labour’s wild accusations, he will succeed in establishing himself in the public mind as the Prime Minister material.

Undoubtedly, sometimes forgiving, it will be attractive to return insults. It can definitely fill them. In 2010, Herman Van Rompuy, the President of the Council of Europe at the European Parliament, said ‘charisma of a damp cloth and a low -grade bank officer’.

Probably right and even quite funny. It is definitely not in the same Nastiness league where Emek has played for the last few days. But someone who suggests him to become the Prime Minister of England should resist the provocative language, even if 10 is not the present.

Starmer and his colleagues – members of a great political party – how tragic how tragic they are. Rather than creating an example, they sound like the worst vandals of social media.

What he says, as Farage suggested in his video, can provoke the ‘Radical Left’ and puts the security of those who represent the reform at risk. Starmer accuses Farage of being a ‘separatist’, but he and Labor, division and disagreement.

In his speech, he described himself as a person who respects British tolerance and moral values, unlike Nigel Farage. The party’s choice of provocative language proves that this is the opposite.

Sir Keir Starmer angular and desperate. Thus, in his political enemies, Trumpian unites in the style of the style. How much damage will our country damage before our Prime Minister finally left the stage?