The US right claimed free speech was sacred – until the Charlie Kirk killing | Charlie Kirk shooting

A explanation was great on the days of emotionally and politically accused since the murder of Conservative Youth Activist Charlie Kirk, a close ally of Donald Trump. On Monday, the US Chief Public Prosecutor responsible for the rule of law in the United States said that the Trump administration will “definitely target those who adopt“ hate speech ”about Kirk.

Unlike many other countries, hate speech is protected by the US law unless it causes close violence or does not pose a real threat. However, this did not deter him the best law enforcement force in the country, proposed For example – this – a printed shop employee who refuses to suppress the brochures reminiscent of Kirk can be “prosecution”.

Kirk was caught with a bitter debate about the relationship between political speech and violence, as he was shot at the university students in Utah at the beginning of this month. Bondi later took back some words because of his concern about the re -framework of “Free Speech iyle as“ hate speech ”because of the criticisms of other conservatives. However, Trump, Vice President JD Vance, White House Advisor Stephen Miller and other senior Republicans Kirk’s death, as a result of the uncontrolled and severe discourses they blamed on the left -wing, framing.

It is a remarkable turn of the leading American conservatives who have complained about a censorship of censorship for a long time until Trump returned to power in January, but now he is happy to re -frame it as a “result culture .. Nancy Mace, a home representative, was very similar to the progresses he often threw for their political righteousness. announced During his effort to censor one of his competitors in Congress last week, he said, olmayan not free from the results of free speech ”.

Many conservatives are now advocating a public campaign to expel the Americans who illuminate Kirk’s death or underestimate the policy of death. Meanwhile, the administrative officials continue to prepare an executive order for Trump that aims to “combat political violence and hate speech ,, the New York Times reported.

Aaron Teron, Director of the Individual Rights and Expression Foundation (Ateş) Foundation, was assassinated by Kirk’s assassination, “an inferiority political violence, an anger and anger, grief and anger that built its brand around the campus debate”.

However, instead of recommending free speech as a “basic value ,, the reaction of many public officials was the opposite.

“They explicitly collapse the distinction between political opposition and political violence and lay the basis of mass censorship and surveillance of political critics.”

Jimmy Kimmel, the talc show server, the largest cup of the printing campaign. After a part of Kimmel’s show appeared Kirk’s assassin, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), the state institution that regulates the broadcasting, called on the sympathy of the TV networks to quit Kimmel’s show. On Wednesday, ABC announced that he had suspended the program indefinitely.

FCC President Brendan Carr applauded ABC’s surrender – just two years ago, a free speech is an important “Check the government control. So censorship is authoritarian dream”.

“This is an extreme reaction, Kat said Katie Fallow, a lawyer at the Knight First Amendment Institute, and“ and “and a kind of ‘cancellation culture’, which the big figures on the right have criticized for many years.

Bondi’s discourse, Irvine, California University of Law Professor and American University Professors Association (AAUP) General Advisor to the status of the Status of the American law enforcement officers, he said. “This is a sign that this administration doesn’t just care about the first change, but they really don’t understand.”

Although Kimmel is the most important media figure punished so far, in recent days number Journalists faced the loss of their work or other disciplinary measures in either direct promoting or predicting conservative pressure. Under Jeff Bezos, who saw that the Owner’s Owner’s Owner’s Owner approached the political right – at the beginning of the week – terminated Columnist Karen Attiah, Kirk’s political views about the ugly, he said.

Academics are also threatened, and three professors at the University of Clemson in South Carolina. hot To make inappropriate social media publications about the death of Kirk for claiming. Dubal is worried about it aggressive campaign Professors’ expulsion or disciplined for their “extrovert” speeches, especially when academics are often entitled to meticulous processes before they are often terminated.

Many employers seem to have decided to violate the principles of academic freedom and contract -based obligation.

Indeed, Nadas finds an attempt to suppress the speech after Kirk’s death, because the second Trump administration sees this as a larger and larger -like attempt, not limited to investigation or financial penalties because of protests to use every branch of power to try and suppress the opposition and cold speech ;; Targeting the administrative orders for legal activities of law firms; deporting international students for participating in protests or for OP-ED writings; To kick the journalists from the White House press conferences according to the publications of their publications; and the introduction of meaningless insult cases against media organizations.

Fallows, General Message, Trump or if you do not agree with “you will be in the plus signs of management”.

Although some people have argued that Kimmel is suspended or professors’ on the grounds that they are private employer decisions, and the first change -protected public speech issues, DUBAL and other experts think that the government’s increasingly naked participation makes it difficult for this argument to carry water.

“Here… There is vice president [Vance] Who calls the employer [and] Third -party awake organizations and individuals to force employers to force their employees and others to terminate based on speaking, ”he said.

Conservatives make arguments similar to what some progressives do about the cancellation culture, sweat, especially ignitionThe platforms and social media shames that occur during the national “reckoning öz after the murder of George Floyd. “And at that time, the conservatives rightly argued that we should think of free speech not only as a legal right, but as a wider cultural value.”

Now, Ter, “Most of the same politicians who have long been frightening against the cancellation culture lead the highest calls for the highest censorship – usually, clearly or indirectly, they use rationists they have been rejected when they are called by the left: ‘This hate speech.’ ‘This wrong information.’ ‘This will lead to violence.’ ‘Stochastic Terrorism.’ ‘This conversation makes us insecure.’ It is incredible and the lesson here is a weapon waiting to be taken from the other side.

Some conservatives pushed back. Bondi’s statements were condemned by Rightwing commentators, especially Matt Walsh and Tucker Carlson. Walsh, who referred to Bondi, wrote on social media: “Get rid of it. Today. This is crazy. Conservatives have fought for the right to reject the service for decades… Now Pam Bondi wants to go back for any reason.”

In Walsh controversial A pressure on speaking will return to the right to be haunted: “Every Trump supporter who threatens Trump at the moment, a democratic president of Jimmy Kimmel, a democratic president in 4 years, should applaud Fox News unless he suspends Greg Gutfeld. Hey Maga, do you understand?”

Dubal said that conservative experts think he was right to Lambast Bondi. “There are broad principles of speaking in this country… and the idea that businesses and individuals based on protected speech would pursue were really shocking.”

The deceased Kirk was an inconsistent defender of free speech – the organization, Turning Point USA, a famous dangerous leftist professors, a “monitoring list” continues a “monitoring list” – but some conservatives would not ask for the right to return to the free expression. “You hope that the death of Charlie Kirk will not be used by bad actors. in question.

“Hate speech legally does not exist in America,” written Last year on social media. “There is an ugly conversation. There is a gross conversation. There is a bad conversation. And they are all protected by the first change. Keep America free.”