Supreme Court upholds ‘roving patrols’ for immigration stops in Los Angeles
Washington – The Supreme Court reigned for the Trump administration on Monday, and admitted that US immigrant agents could stop and detain everyone they suspect in the United States, which is in the United States, which is slightly more than working in a car washing in the USA, speaking Spanish or brown -skinned.
6-3 margin, justice An urgent appeal was given And a Los Angeles judge lifted his order, which prevented people from grabing people from the streets of Southern California, which language they spoke, what business they do, or where they were.
According to an accepting view, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said that the federal law could take a ‘a person’ to question a person ‘to question a’ ‘person’ to question a ” person ‘.
Three liberal justice opposed.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor decision “Another serious abuse of our emergency document.
Sotomayor, “the government … All Latins working in low -wage jobs, US citizens, or not at any time, dismissed, dismissed and satisfaction of agents is a fair game until the evidence of their legal status,” he said.
Sotomayor also did not participate in Kavanaugh’s claims.
They do not make short stops to question ‘immigration agents’, but they also want to believe. Firearms, physical violence and warehouses are seizing people who use detention, ”he wrote. “Unquestioned immigrants are also damaged by the government’s behavior. US citizens are also seized, taken from their jobs and preventing them from working to support themselves and their families.”
The decision is an important victory for Trump, often paves the way for the “largest mass deportation operation” in American history.
From the beginning of June, Trump has targeted Los Angeles with his appointments, long -term residents, legal immigrants and even aggressive street scans, which consider the US citizens.
Civil Rights Groups and Local Lawyers Coalition challenged the cases of three immigrants and two US citizens who were caught in chaotic arrests and claimed that they were caught without reasonable suspicion – the violation of the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures.
On July 11, US Regional Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong issued a temporary limitation prohibition stops based on ethnicity, language, location or employment.
On July 28, the US 9th Circuit Appeal Court adopted.
The case remains in the first stages with hearings for the decision of the preliminary precaution. However, the Ministry of Justice argued that even a short limit on mass arrests constitutes a “irreparable injury” to the government.
A few days later, Trump’s lawyers asked the Supreme Court To put aside Frimpong’s order. They said that agents should act according to their common sense belief that Spanish -speaking Latins working in daily workers, car wash or landscape and agriculture do not have legal status.
Lawyer Gen. D. John Sauer appeal, “reasonable doubt is a low rod – under the possible cause,” he wrote. Representatives may think of the “integrity of conditions ında while stopping,“ illegal assets in the central region are widespread. [of California]1 out of every 10 people here is an illegal alien. “
Both sides said that various demographic characteristics of the region support the views of the law. In the application for participating in the case, Los Angeles and 20 other Southern California Municipality “half of the central region population” now argued that the government has met the reasonable suspicion criteria.
Roughly 10 million Latin lives in the seven districts covered by the order, and almost many speak a language other than English.
Sauer also questioned whether the plaintiffs who sued were not likely to be arrested again.
This argument was the subject of sharp and expanded inquiry in the 9th period, which the three referee panels were finally rejected.
When the panel rejected his stay in his opinion on July 28, he wrote, “Over the years, over the years, over a few weeks, he made many stops in the Los Angeles region,” he wrote.
9. The circuit said that a plaintiff had been stopped twice in 10 days, and the evidence of “real and urgent threats ,, that he or others could be stopped again.
Days after this decision, the heavy armed border patrol agents jumped from behind a Penske moving truck and grabbed the workers from the parking lot of a WESTLAKE House Warehouse against the courts.
Immigrant rights defenders called for justice not to intervene.
“The raids followed a pattern contrary to the constitution that the authorities promised to continue,” he said. The decision for Trump would give the authority to “give an extraordinarily extensive Dragnet authority and put people who comply with millions of laws at the risk of detention by federal agents”.
The judge’s order had applied in a region including Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Santura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo, as well as Los Angeles and Orange districts.
Savage, Sharp from Los Angeles from Washington.
