No bomb, no peace: Israel and Iran collide

Israel’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities, even if there is nothing to strike yet, for the first time reveals striking logic, Dr Binoy Kampmark writes.

Preventive attacks in international law are rarely justified. The threat should reveal itself with obvious intention to cause injury. Michael Walzer is looking for A ‘Supreme Emergency’ And if the force is not used, it occurs in a situation where the risk of defeat will be significantly increased.

It is almost impossible to reach an assessment. The proof of such a threat by the aggressive state must be speculative by hiding other strategic goals that transform this action into illegal, preventive war. Israel Ongoing attacks Iran’s nuclear infrastructure takes place in the absence of nuclear weapons motivated by the hypothetical scenario that such weapons will irreversibly develop against the Jewish state and will be used.

In other words, Iran was punished for a crime of thought.

. Israeli Defense Forces It was published expression Expressing the justification:

The weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are a threat to the state of Israel and an important threat to the whole world. The Israeli State will not allow a regime, whose goal is to have mass destruction of the Israeli state. ‘

There is even a privilege that IDF officials have not guaranteed victorious success in the operation; The Israelis had to support themselves before the inevitable reaction.

IDF Lieutenant General Pellet pronoun announced:

“I cannot promise absolute success – the Iranian regime will try to attack us in response, and the expected cost will be different from what we are used to.”

Secretary of Defence, Israel Katzoffers some wishful thinking Justify the attack:

“Now we are at a critical intersection. If we miss it, it will not be a way to prevent Iran from buying nuclear weapons that will endanger our own existence.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu preferred exaggeration eyelashes, declare In a video description of the nation:

“If we don’t attack, we’ll die 100 percent.”

This is the belief that such operations will result in well-behavioral retaliation in a sustainable policy in the absence of Iran from preventing a nuclear option indefinitely. With typical heresy, these attacks step into demands by the US President. Donald Trump This Tehran resorted to Meek diplomacy, which is an effort to extinguish with these attacks.

What will be the threat of Iran?

US National Intelligence Director in March this year Tulsi Gabbard To the Senate Intelligence Committee evaluation It was:

“… Iran does not build a nuclear weapon and the supreme leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khameni He did not allow the nuclear weapon program he had suspended in 2003. ”

But Netanyahu is already a directive To prevent Tehran’s efforts to build a nuclear device in November 2024:

“Directive came shortly after the assassination [Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah. “

The wider logic of Israel here is less than the consistency of the nuclear threat, it is less than solving points and crippling a competitor, although it is not directly from the deputy militias, it is for a long time it accused of directing against its interests.

When it comes to the logic of being out of head, nothing is done. The arrival of Colt 45 guns in the late 1800s undisputedly calm The American West is influenced by a way of claiming that it has less power and its will against strong and descents. Sometimes he became “peaceful ılan which was defined as“ great ekolayzır ..

As part of the same logic, late International Relations Theoretician Kenneth n Waltz suggested that nuclear weapons make war less likelyI believe this ‘The gradual spread of nuclear weapons should be met with more pleasure than feared’. He even went so far to discuss Iran’s purchasing nuclear weapons in 2012 ‘Probably … Restore stability to the Middle East’. Israel’s durable nuclear monopoly in the Middle East ‘Long bellows imbalance’ in the region.

The invention of nuclear weapons was an expression of intention that having such a weapon would resemble a boss’s protection of protection of God. This is a lesson that Israelis should know better than most, they have acquired a nuclear inventory that has not been declared secretly. It will not weaken you, reduce the international stance, make it vulnerable to the attack.

North Korea learned this greeting lesson motivated with two superior examples: In 2003, Iraq’s illegal invasion is the US leadership “Willing coalition”And the collective attack on Libya in 2011 is under the doctrine of the responsibility for apparently protection. Saddam HusseinIraq and Muammar GaddafiLibya made them vulnerable against the attack. They deprived of a terrible deterrence, humiliated.

Attempts to control proliferation have been largely flawed because the nuclear option is never fully understood. Despite the admirable steps in international law to stamped nuclear weapons, the best reflected Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weaponsI’m not even talking about the tireless workers of the international campaign to eliminate nuclear weapons (Ican) Nuclear Weapons Club continues to be a permanent provocation and encouragement for non -nuclear weapons states. It is a red cloth for the bull.

These attacks will do very little to weaken Mullah’s determination in Tehran. They are the scope of the murder of scientists and their families) and comprehensive attempts to underestimate in international law. Netanyahu’s absurd lessons to the Iranian people – We bomb you to free you – It will be flattened.

With the most results, Islamic State It is more mandatory to acquire a nuclear weapon than ever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqukce80rh0

Dr Binoy Kampmark is a Cambridge scholar and lecturer. RMIT UNIVERSITY. You can follow Dr Kampmark on Twitter @BKAMPMARK.

Support independent journalism subscribe to IA.