Why US Think Tank Warns Trump Administration Against Treating India Like Japan, EU | World News

New Delhi: The tensions between India and the United States increased after bringing a 50% tariff to the goods imported from the United States and creating serious concerns about the future of bilateral relations. In the past, the two countries had worked closely to resist China’s increasing influence in the region.

A new report revealed that the US made a major mistake by treating India as it treats Japan and the European Union (EU) in trade policies. According to the Atlantic Council, an American Thinking Council, the Trump administration’s focusing on the pressure of India through trade measures led to a collapse in the vineyards. New Delhi felt that Washington was wrong because he could not understand his unique economic needs and strategic priorities.

The increasing competition between the two countries is not a single diplomatic wrong step, but a series of actions that reflect the lack of understanding on both sides. US policy makers assumed that India would lead to the same trade demands of Japan and the EU.

However, India refused to make concessions to endanger its economic and political interests and long -term goals. Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to President Donald Trump for helping to alleviate tensions between India and Pakistan and led to anger in Washington.

In retaliation, Trump targeted India’s energy trade, especially its relations with Russia, and hoped that India would comply with American energy policies.

India’s solid stance

Instead of succumbing to the external pressure, India adopted a solid and determined stance. According to analysts, this was a critical mistake by the American. Instead of leaning on US demands, India stood in place. The disappointment among the Indians who have been boiled since the 1970s flared up again. As a sovereign nation, India, especially countries such as China, continued to enter energy trade with Russia, refused to implement tax on exports.

This perceived double standard led to many Indians to question the fairness of US policies. The Atlantic Council stressed that such contradictory approaches reduce the diplomatic reliability of the US and weaken its ability to achieve its goals.

The Trump administration believed that economic pressure would fulfill the demands of countries such as India. However, India has always given priority to its independence in foreign policy and avoided itself closely with any great global power. This stance is particularly evident in India’s energy policies, where confidence in Russian oil is critical for its industrial needs. If India had stopped importing oil from Russia, it would have been forced to buy more expensive oil from the Middle East that would adversely affect its economy.

India complies with the price limit implemented by the G7 on Russian oil and receives more energy than the US itself. However, while America turned a blind eye to the actions of other countries such as China, he chose to focus on India. The implementation of these selective policies weakened the US position and made it difficult to achieve diplomatic goals. The Atlantic Council argued that this lack of consistency in US policy weakens its relationship with India and its wider strategy.

India’s strategic importance to the USA

The relationship between India and the United States has long been regarded as the cornerstone of America’s Indo-Pacific strategy. India plays an important role in the Four Security Dialogue (Quad), a strategic grouping of the USA, India, Japan and Australia, created to resist the increasing influence of China in the region.

The ability to reduce India’s dependence on China, especially in terms of critical minerals, has made it a valuable ally for the United States. Since the Bush administration, Washington has seen India as a key balance in China.

However, the increasing tensions between the new Delhi and Washington can bring India closer to BRICS nations, including China, Russia and Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

If India shifts its focus to these countries, it can challenge the US ability to maintain its influence in Asia and provide secure access to critical resources. The Atlantic Council warned that this could weaken the US strategic goals in the region and weaken its position in the global order.

Call for a balanced approach

In order to repair the damaged relationship, the report of the Atlantic Council proposes that the US should adopt a more balanced and nuanced approach to India. First, Washington must remove the tariffs given to India to buy Russian oil, especially because it is attached to the price limit of India’s G7. Any criminal action should be applied equally to all countries, not only to India.

Secondly, the United States, probably with a new US-India strategic dialogue, should re-interact in trade discussions with India. This dialogue should be focused on key issues such as trade, energy security and supply chains, and senior officials from both sides should be included.

Third, the US-India CEO forum, established during the George W. Bush administration, should be revived to allow business leaders from both countries to cooperate and strengthen their ties.

Although India and the United States are not natural enemies, they cannot be automatic allies. America should carefully approach the relationship with the country by understanding the unique cultural and political necessities of the country. If the United States wants to keep a reliable partner in Asia, to strengthen supply chains and to resist the influence of China, it should re -evaluate its approach.

According to the Atlantic Council, a strong and lasting relationship between India and the United States can only be built on mutual respect and long -term common interests.